Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27185041›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: a qualitative study.

Victoria A Wade, Alan D Taylor, Michael R Kidd, Colin Carati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trends in Telecare Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Physiotherapists' perspective of telehealth during the Covid-19 pandemic.International journal of medical informatics · 2021
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy.Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria A WadeDiscipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, North Tce., Adelaide, 5005, Australia. victoria.wade@adelaide.edu.au.
Alan D TaylorFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia.
Michael R KiddFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia.
Colin CaratiFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia.
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was a component of the Flinders Telehealth in the Home project, which tested adding home telehealth to existing rehabilitation, palliative care and geriatric outreach services. Due to the known difficulty of transitioning telehealth projects services, a qualitative study was conducted to produce a preferred implementation approach for sustainable and large-scale operations, and a process model that offers practical advice for achieving this goal.

methodsInitially, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior clinicians, health service managers and policy makers, and a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken to identify the range of options for ongoing operations, plus the factors affecting sustainability. Subsequently, the interviewees and other decision makers attended a deliberative forum in which participants were asked to select a preferred model for future implementation. Finally, all data from the study was synthesised by the researchers to produce a process model.

results19 interviews with senior clinicians, managers, and service development staff were conducted, finding strong support for home telehealth but a wide diversity of views on governance, models of clinical care, technical infrastructure operations, and data management. The deliberative forum worked through these options and recommended a collaborative consortium approach for large-scale implementation. The process model proposes that the key factor for large-scale implementation is leadership support, which is enabled by 1) showing solutions to the problems of service demand, budgetary pressure and the relationship between hospital and primary care, 2) demonstrating how home telehealth aligns with health service policies, and 3) achieving clinician acceptance through providing evidence of benefit and developing new models of clinical care. Two key actions to enable change were marketing telehealth to patients, clinicians and policy-makers, and building a community of practice.

conclusionsThe implementation of home telehealth services is still in an early stage. Change agents and a community of practice can contribute by marketing telehealth, demonstrating policy alignment and providing potential solutions for difficult health services problems. This should assist health leaders to move from trials to large-scale services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCooperative BehaviorHealth PolicyHome Care ServicesHumansMarketing of Health ServicesPalliative CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTelemedicineTransitional CareChange managementDeliberative forumHome telehealthModels of careQualitative studySustainability

Identifiers

PMID27185041
PMCPMC4869378
OpenAlexW2397047231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.