Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27184992›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2016

Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms.

Becky A Purkaple, James W Mold, Sixia Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05037682 (Addressing Opioid Use Disorder in the Elderly Through Primary Care Innovation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05037682 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Opioid Use Disorder in the Elderly Through Primary Care Innovation: Pain and Opioid Management in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OklahomaRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,035ConditionsPain, Chronic, Opioid Use DisorderArmsDissemination and Implementation Research
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Game of Mirrors: Health Profiles in Patient and Physician Perceptions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Update in Interstitial Lung Disease 2020.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Becky A PurkapleUniversity of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma becky-purkaple@ouhsc.edu.
James W MoldDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Sixia ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI PAUL G SPICER · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient participation in clinical decision making improves outcomes, including quality of life (QOL), but the typical problem-oriented approach may impede consideration of functional goals. We wondered if patients could encourage primary care physicians to pay attention to their QOL goals by writing them on pre-encounter forms.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of 2 different pre-visit questionnaires on the content of patient-physician encounters in a family medicine practice at an academic medical center. Using investigator-blinded block randomization, we arranged for 8 faculty and 8 resident physicians to participate in 2 intervention and 2 control videotaped encounters each for a total of 64 encounters. The intervention questionnaire included questions about QOL goals and concerns, while the control questionnaire asked about symptoms. Videotapes were reviewed to determine whether the patients' QOL goals were mentioned and whether they were used in decision making. We also scored encounters using Modified Flanders Interaction Analysis, which assesses and codifies patient and physician communication, and the Modified Carkhuff-Truax Scale, which measures empathy, attending, congruence, and positive regard.

resultsPatients were able to record QOL goals and concerns, but QOL issues were mentioned in only 2 of the 64 encounters, once by a patient and once by a physician. In neither case was this information used in decision making. More empathy was expressed by physicians during control encounters (P = .03).

conclusionsPatients were able to articulate their QOL goals on paper, but that did not prime them or their physicians to alter the process or content of the clinical encounters. In fact, providing QOL information was associated with reduced physician empathy.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilyQuality of LifeAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedCommunicationEmpathyFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOklahomafamily medicinegeneral practicegoal-directed carepatient-centered carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID27184992
PMCPMC4868560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.