Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27184872›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells by Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Potential Clinical Applications.

Shu-Ping Li, Quan-Lin Guan, Da Zhao, Guang-Jun Pei, Hong-Xin Su, Lan-Ning Du, Jin-Xiang He, Zhao-Chen Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shu-Ping LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Quan-Lin GuanDepartment of Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Da ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Guang-Jun PeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Hong-Xin SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Lan-Ning DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Jin-Xiang HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
Zhao-Chen LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China (mainland).
First Hospital of Lanzhou University · CNLanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are tumor cells that leave the primary tumor site and enter the bloodstream, where they can spread to other organs; they are very important in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of malignant tumors. However, few studies have investigated CTCs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the CTCs in blood of ESCC patients and its potential relevance to clinicopathological features and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS CTCs were acquired by a negative enrichment method that used magnetic activated cell sorting (MACSTM). Fluorescent immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to identify the CTCs. Then, the positive CTC patients with ESCC were analyzed, after which the relationship between CTCs and clinicopathologic features was evaluated. RESULTS In the present study, 62 out of 140 (44.3%) patients with ESCC were positive for CTCs. The positive rate of CTCs was significantly related with stage of ESCC patients (P=0.013). However, there was no relationship between CTC status and age, sex, smoking tumor history, tumor location, differentiation of tumor, lymphatic invasion, or lymph venous invasion (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients positive for CTCs had significantly shorter survival time than patients negative for CTCs. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that stage and CTC status were significant prognostic factors for patients with ESCC. CONCLUSIONS CTCs positivity is an independent prognostic biomarker that indicates a worse prognosis for patients with ESCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27184872
PMCPMC4918518
OpenAlexW2396662319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.