Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27184418›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

Pharmacokinetics of metronomic chemotherapy: a neglected but crucial aspect.

Guido Bocci, Robert S Kerbel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Residual Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. JCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guido BocciDivisione di Farmacologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Pisa, Via Roma, 55, I-56126 Pisa, Italy.
Robert S KerbelSunnybrook Research Institute/Odette Cancer Centre, Biologic Sciences Platform, S-217, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metronomic chemotherapy describes the close, regular administration of chemotherapy drugs at less-toxic doses over prolonged periods of time. In 2015, the results of randomized phase III clinical trials demonstrated encouraging, albeit limited, efficacy benefits of metronomic chemotherapy regimens administered as adjuvant maintenance therapy for the treatment of breast cancer, or as maintenance therapy in combination with an antiangiogenic agent for metastatic colorectal cancer. Owing to the investigational nature of this approach, metronomic chemotherapy regimens are highly empirical in terms of the optimal dose and schedule for the drugs administered; therefore, greater knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of metronomic chemotherapy is critical to the future success of this treatment strategy. Unfortunately, such preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic studies are rare. Herein, we present situations in which active drug concentrations have been achieved with metronomic schedules, and discuss their associated pharmacokinetic parameters. We summarize examples from the limited number of clinical studies in order to illustrate the importance of assessing such pharmacokinetic parameters, and discuss the influence this information can have on improving efficacy and reducing toxicity.

Indexed as

Administration, MetronomicAlkylating AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCamptothecinClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleForecastingHumansImmunity, CellularPyrimidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTubulin Modulators5-fluoropyrimidineAlkylating AgentsAngiogenesis InhibitorsCamptothecinPyrimidinesTubulin Modulators

Identifiers

PMID27184418
OpenAlexW2396078839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.