Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27184203›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Consistent cortical reconstruction and multi-atlas brain segmentation.

Yuankai Huo, Andrew J Plassard, Aaron Carass, Susan M Resnick, Dzung L Pham, Jerry L Prince, Bennett A Landman

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. FLAIRNeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuankai HuoElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: yuankai.huo@vanderbilt.edu.
Andrew J PlassardComputer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Aaron CarassImage Analysis and Communications Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan M ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dzung L PhamCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jerry L PrinceImage Analysis and Communications Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bennett A LandmanElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USJohns Hopkins University · USJackson Foundation · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
'T V ASSESSMENT - MEMORY DISORDERED PATIENTS'P50AG005146 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUGANIR, RICHARD L · 1985 to 2019
$37.6M
Neuroimaging Predictors of Cognitive Decline, Impairment, and ResilienceZIAAG000191 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI FERRUCCI, LUIGI · 2009 to 2025
$26.4M
Computer-Assisted functional neurosurgeryR01EB006136 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2006 to 2013
$4.0M
Automatic Cerebellar MRI Labeling In Health and DiseaseR01NS056307 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
Brain Image Analysis Tools for Quantitative Longitudinal Assessment of MSR01NS070906 · NINDS · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI PHAM, DZUNG L · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Autosegmentation for head and neck RadiotherapyR01EB006193 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
An Interactive Web-Based Game for Collaborative Labeling of Medical ImagesR21NS064534 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2009 to 2010
$436k
Ventricle segmentation and labeling to characterize normal pressure hydrocephalusR21NS096497 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Segmentation and volumetric quantification of thalamic nuclei for assessing MSR21NS082891 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2013 to 2014
$425k
Quantitative Image Analysis Techniques for Optic Nerve DiseaseR21EY024036 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2014 to 2015
$410k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024036NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005146NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006136NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006193NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB012461NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056307NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070906NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS064534NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS082891NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS096497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole brain segmentation and cortical surface reconstruction are two essential techniques for investigating the human brain. Spatial inconsistences, which can hinder further integrated analyses of brain structure, can result due to these two tasks typically being conducted independently of each other. FreeSurfer obtains self-consistent whole brain segmentations and cortical surfaces. It starts with subcortical segmentation, then carries out cortical surface reconstruction, and ends with cortical segmentation and labeling. However, this "segmentation to surface to parcellation" strategy has shown limitations in various cohorts such as older populations with large ventricles. In this work, we propose a novel "multi-atlas segmentation to surface" method called Multi-atlas CRUISE (MaCRUISE), which achieves self-consistent whole brain segmentations and cortical surfaces by combining multi-atlas segmentation with the cortical reconstruction method CRUISE. A modification called MaCRUISE(+) is designed to perform well when white matter lesions are present. Comparing to the benchmarks CRUISE and FreeSurfer, the surface accuracy of MaCRUISE and MaCRUISE(+) is validated using two independent datasets with expertly placed cortical landmarks. A third independent dataset with expertly delineated volumetric labels is employed to compare segmentation performance. Finally, 200MR volumetric images from an older adult sample are used to assess the robustness of MaCRUISE and FreeSurfer. The advantages of MaCRUISE are: (1) MaCRUISE constructs self-consistent voxelwise segmentations and cortical surfaces, while MaCRUISE(+) is robust to white matter pathology. (2) MaCRUISE achieves more accurate whole brain segmentations than independently conducting the multi-atlas segmentation. (3) MaCRUISE is comparable in accuracy to FreeSurfer (when FreeSurfer does not exhibit global failures) while achieving greater robustness across an older adult population. MaCRUISE has been made freely available in open source.

Indexed as

Subtraction TechniqueAdultAlgorithmsCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCerebral cortexCortical reconstructionMagnetic resonance imagingMulti-atlas segmentation

Identifiers

PMID27184203
PMCPMC4927397
OpenAlexW2391545620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.