Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27184093›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2016

Impact of a bronchial genomic classifier on clinical decision making in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for lung cancer.

J Scott Ferguson, Ryan Van Wert, Yoonha Choi, Michael J Rosenbluth, Kate Porta Smith, Jing Huang, Avrum Spira

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Airway Transcriptome as a Biomarker for Early Lung Cancer Detection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Scott FergusonDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Suite 5233, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. jsferguson@medicine.wisc.edu.
Ryan Van WertDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, H3143 MC 5236, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Yoonha ChoiVeracyte, Inc, 6000 Shoreline Ct, #300, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Michael J RosenbluthVeracyte, Inc, 6000 Shoreline Ct, #300, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Kate Porta SmithVeracyte, Inc, 6000 Shoreline Ct, #300, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Jing HuangVeracyte, Inc, 6000 Shoreline Ct, #300, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Avrum SpiraDivision of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchoscopy is frequently used for the evaluation of suspicious pulmonary lesions found on computed tomography, but its sensitivity for detecting lung cancer is limited. Recently, a bronchial genomic classifier was validated to improve the sensitivity of bronchoscopy for lung cancer detection, demonstrating a high sensitivity and negative predictive value among patients at intermediate risk (10-60 %) for lung cancer with an inconclusive bronchoscopy. Our objective for this study was to determine if a negative genomic classifier result that down-classifies a patient from intermediate risk to low risk (<10 %) for lung cancer would reduce the rate that physicians recommend more invasive testing among patients with an inconclusive bronchoscopy.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, prospective, decision impact survey study assessing pulmonologist recommendations in patients undergoing workup for lung cancer who had an inconclusive bronchoscopy. Cases with an intermediate pretest risk for lung cancer were selected from the AEGIS trials and presented in a randomized fashion to pulmonologists either with or without the patient's bronchial genomic classifier result to determine how the classifier results impacted physician decisions.

resultsTwo hundred two physicians provided 1523 case evaluations on 36 patients. Invasive procedure recommendations were reduced from 57 % without the classifier result to 18 % with a negative (low risk) classifier result (p < 0.001). Invasive procedure recommendations increased from 50 to 65 % with a positive (intermediate risk) classifier result (p < 0.001). When stratifying by ultimate disease diagnosis, there was an overall reduction in invasive procedure recommendations in patients with benign disease when classifier results were reported (54 to 41 %, p < 0.001). For patients ultimately diagnosed with malignant disease, there was an overall increase in invasive procedure recommendations when the classifier results were reported (50 to 64 %, p = 0.003).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that a negative (low risk) bronchial genomic classifier result reduces invasive procedure recommendations following an inconclusive bronchoscopy and that the classifier overall reduces invasive procedure recommendations among patients ultimately diagnosed with benign disease. These results support the potential clinical utility of the classifier to improve management of patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspect lung cancer by reducing additional invasive procedures in the setting of benign disease.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingBronchoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenomicsHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersBronchoscopyClinical utilityDecision makingGene expressionLung cancerSolitary pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID27184093
PMCPMC4869188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.