Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27183915›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

Absorbable polymeric surgical clips for appendicular stump closure: A randomized control trial of laparoscopic appendectomy with lapro-clips.

Bo Lv, Xin Zhang, Jun Li, Shusheng Leng, Shuqiang Li, Yunlong Zeng, Bing Wang, Jiatian Yuan, Jun Fan, Shasha Xing and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Silent invasion of Hem-O-Lok clip.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo LvGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Xin ZhangGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Jun LiGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Shusheng LengGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Shuqiang LiGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Yunlong ZengGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Bing WangGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Jiatian YuanGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Jun FanGeneral Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Shasha XingCentral Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Ci LiPathology Department, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610081, P.R. China.
Chengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized control trial was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of absorbable polymeric clips for appendicular stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Patients were randomly enrolled into an experimental group (ligation of the appendicular base with Lapro-Clips, L-C group) or control group (ligation of the appendicular base with Hem-o-lok Clips, H-C group). We identified 1,100 patients who underwent LA between April 1, 2012 and February 3, 2015. Overall, 99 patients (9.0%, 99/1,100) developed a complication following LA (47 [8.5%] in the L-C group and 52 [9.5%] in the H-C group (P = 0.598). No statistically significant differences were observed in intra-abdominal abscesses, stump leakage, superficial wound infections, post-operative abdominal pain, overall adverse events, or the duration of the operations and hospital stays between the groups (all p > 0.05). Adverse risk factors associated with the use of absorbable clips in LA included body mass index ≥ 27.5 kg/m2, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists degree ≥ III, gangrenous appendicitis, severe inflammation of the appendix base, appendix perforation, and the absence of peritoneal drainage. The results indicate that the Lapro-Clip is a safe and effective device for closing the appendicular stump in LA in select patients with appendicitis.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsPolymersSurgical InstrumentsWound Closure TechniquesAdultAppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultPolymersabsorbable clipappendicitisappendix stump closurelaparoscopic appendectomy

Identifiers

PMID27183915
PMCPMC5173057
OpenAlexW2348754695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.