Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Impact of Wild Loci on the Allergenic Potential of Cultivated Tomato Fruits.

Alessandra Ghiani, Nunzio D'Agostino, Sandra Citterio, Assunta Raiola, Riccardo Asero, Amalia Barone, Maria Manuela Rigano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra GhianiDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Nunzio D'AgostinoConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria - Centro di ricerca per l'orticoltura, Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy.
Sandra CitterioDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Assunta RaiolaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Riccardo AseroAllergy Unit, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Milan, Italy.
Amalia BaroneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Maria Manuela RiganoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Portici, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITCentro di Ricerca per l’Orticoltura · ITOspedale San Carlo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most extensively consumed vegetables but, unfortunately, it is also able to induce allergic reactions. In the past, it has been shown that the choice of tomato cultivar significantly influenced the allergic reaction of tomato allergic subjects. In this study we investigated the allergenic potential of the cultivated tomato line M82 and of two selected lines carrying small chromosome regions from the wild species Solanum pennellii (i.e. IL7-3 and IL12-4). We evaluated the positive interactions of IgEs of allergic subjects in order to investigate the different allergenic potential of the lines under investigation. We used proteomic analyses in order to identify putative tomato allergens. In addition, bioinformatic and transcriptomic approaches were applied in order to analyse the structure and the expression profiles of the identified allergen-encoding genes. These analyses demonstrated that fruits harvested from the two selected introgression lines harbour a different allergenic potential as those from the cultivated genotype M82. The different allergenicity found within the three lines was mostly due to differences in the IgE recognition of a polygalacturonase enzyme (46 kDa), one of the major tomato allergens, and of a pectin methylesterase (34 kDa); both the proteins were more immunoreactive in IL7-3 compared to IL12-4 and M82. The observed differences in the allergenic potential were mostly due to line-dependent translational control or post-translational modifications of the allergens. We demonstrated, for the first time, that the introgression from a wild species (S. pennellii) in the genomic background of a cultivated tomato line influences the allergenic properties of the fruits. Our findings could support the isolation of favorable wild loci promoting low allergenic potential in tomato.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesQuantitative Trait LociAdolescentAdultAllergensAntigens, PlantFemaleFood HypersensitivityGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGlycosylationHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleProteomeProteomicsAllergensAntigens, PlantImmunoglobulin EProteome

Identifiers

PMID27182705
PMCPMC4868316
OpenAlexW2400896361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.