Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182702›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Rethinking Dosing Regimen Selection of Piperaquine for Malaria Chemoprevention: A Simulation Study.

Nancy C Sambol, Jordan W Tappero, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Sunil Parikh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Pregnancy: Optimization of Target Concentrations of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy C SambolDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jordan W TapperoCenters for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Emmanuel ArinaitweMakerere University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda.
Sunil ParikhYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMakerere University · UGUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

PROMOTING EXTENSIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF QUALITY PREVENTION OF PMTCT ACT IN UGU62PS024421 · PS · PROTECTING FAMILIES AGAINST HIV/AIDS · PI SERUKKA, DAVID · 2004 to 2013
$18.2M
Optimizing HIV-malaria treatment in a shifting treatment and resistance landscape in AfricaR01HD068174 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCESCA T. AWEEKA, SUNIL PARIKH · 2011 to 2026
$8.1M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS024421NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068174PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of short-acting dihydroartemisinin and long-acting piperaquine (DP) is among the first-line therapies for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Population pharmacokinetic models of piperaquine (PQ) based on data from acute treatment of young children can be used to predict exposure profiles of piperaquine under different DP chemoprevention regimens. The purpose of our study was to make such predictions in young children.

methodsBased on a prior population pharmacokinetic model of PQ in young Ugandan children, we simulated capillary plasma concentration-time profiles (including their variability) of candidate chemoprevention regimens for a reference population of 1-2 year olds weighing at least 11 kg. Candidate regimens that were tested included monthly administration of standard therapeutic doses, bimonthly dosing, and weekly dosing (with and without a loading dose).

resultsOnce daily doses of 320 mg for three days (960 mg total) at the beginning of each month are predicted to achieve an average steady-state trough capillary piperaquine concentration of 35 ng/mL, with 60% achieving a level of 30 ng/mL or higher. In contrast, weekly dosing of 320 mg (i.e., 33% higher amount per month) is predicted to approximately double the average steady-state trough concentration, increase the percent of children predicted to achieve 30 ng/mL or higher (94%), while at the same time lowering peak concentrations. Exposure at steady-state, reached at approximately 3 months of multiple dosing, is expected to be approximately 2-fold higher than exposure following initial dosing, due to accumulation. A loading dose improves early exposure, thereby reducing the risk of breakthrough infections at the initiation of chemoprevention.

conclusionsOnce weekly chemoprevention of DP predicts favourable exposures with respect to both trough and peak concentrations. These predictions need to be verified, as well as safety evaluated, in field-based clinical studies of young children. Simulations based on prior knowledge provide a systematic information-driven approach to evaluate candidate DP chemopreventive regimens for future trial designs.

Indexed as

ChemopreventionAntimalarialsComputer SimulationDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumModels, TheoreticalPiperazinesQuinolinesAntimalarialspiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID27182702
PMCPMC4868321
OpenAlexW2407246957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.