Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182629›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016

BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and drugability.

Leslie Z Benet, Chelsea M Hosey, Oleg Ursu, Tudor I Oprea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 306 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
306citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

306 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hormetic Antioxidant Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bioactive Extracts and Constituents fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification of NovelDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article

246 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leslie Z BenetDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Chelsea M HoseyDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Oleg UrsuTranslational Informatics Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Tudor I OpreaTranslational Informatics Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

PHARMACOGENETICS OF MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERSU01GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIACOMINI, KATHLEEN M · 2000 to 2009
$29.2M
Pharmacogenomics of Membrane TransportersU19GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2010 to 2014
$16.3M
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND PHARMACOGENOMICST32GM007175 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHITUV, NADAV, KROETZ, DEANNA L · 1985 to 2021
$7.1M
Illuminating the Druggable Genome Knowledge Management Center (IDG KMC)U54CA189205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI OPREA, TUDOR I · 2014 to 2017
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA189205NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007175NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061390NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rule of 5 methodology appears to be as useful today in defining drugability as when it was proposed, but recognizing that the database that we used includes only drugs that successfully reached the market. We do not view additional criteria necessary nor did we find significant deficiencies in the four Rule of 5 criteria originally proposed by Lipinski and coworkers. BDDCS builds upon the Rule of 5 and can quite successfully predict drug disposition characteristics for drugs both meeting and not meeting Rule of 5 criteria. More recent expansions of classification systems have been proposed and do provide useful qualitative and quantitative predictions for clearance relationships. However, the broad range of applicability of BDDCS beyond just clearance predictions gives a great deal of further usefulness for the combined Rule of 5/BDDCS system.

Indexed as

BiopharmaceuticsAnimalsBileBrainDatabases, FactualHumansKidneyPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsBCSBDDCSBiliary eliminationDrug-likenessMetabolismRenal eliminationRule of 5

Identifiers

PMID27182629
PMCPMC4910824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.