Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182531›Full record

ArticleAdvances in biomedical engineering research

A Coaxial Dielectric Probe Technique for Distinguishing Tooth Enamel from Dental Resin.

Paul M Meaney, Benjamin B Williams, Shireen D Geimer, Ann B Flood, Harold M Swartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in biomedical engineering research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dielectric Properties for Differentiating Normal and Malignant Thyroid Tissues.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Open-Ended Coaxial Dielectric Probe Effective Penetration Depth Determination.IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul M MeaneyThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.
Benjamin B WilliamsGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.
Shireen D GeimerGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.
Ann B FloodGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.
Harold M SwartzGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.

Funding

Microwave Imaging for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy MonitoringR01CA191227 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MEANEY, PAUL M · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA191227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For purposes of biodosimetry in the event of a large scale radiation disaster, one major and very promising point-of contact device is assessing dose using tooth enamel. This technique utilizes the capabilities of electron paramagnetic resonance to measure free radicals and other unpaired electron species, and the fact that the deposition of energy from ionizing radiation produces free radicals in most materials. An important stipulation for this strategy is that the measurements, need to be performed on a central incisor that is basically intact, i.e. which has an area of enamel surface that is as large as the probing tip of the resonator that is without decay or restorative care that replaces the enamel. Therefore, an important consideration is how to quickly assess whether the tooth has sufficient enamel to be measured for dose and whether there is resin present on the tooth being measured and to be able to characterize the amount of surface that is impacted. While there is a relatively small commercially available dielectric probe which could be used in this context, it has several disadvantages for the intended use. Therefore, a smaller, 1.19mm diameter 50 ohm, open-ended, coaxial dielectric probe has been developed as an alternative. The performance of the custom probe was validated against measurement results of known standards. Measurements were taken of multiple teeth enamel and dental resin samples using both probes. While the probe contact with the teeth samples was imperfect and added to measurement variability, the inherent dielectric contrast between the enamel and resin was sufficient that the probe measurements could be used as a robust means of distinguishing the two material types. The smaller diameter probe produced markedly more definitive results in terms of distinguishing the two materials.

Indexed as

Dental ResinDielectric PropertiesElectron Paramagnetic ResonanceOpen-Ended Coaxial ProbeRadiation DosimetryTooth Enamel

Identifiers

PMID27182531
PMCPMC4864612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.