Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182515›Full record

ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons

PERCEPTION OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOUR AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN IN A NIGERIAN TERTIARY HOSPITAL SETTING.

N Q Okojie, E C Isah

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N Q OkojieDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
E C IsahDepartment of Community Health, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
University of Benin Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidural anaesthesia is the preferred technique and gold standard for labour analgesia. However this technique is poorly utilized in our setting .This study is therefore aimed to assess the perception of this technique for labour analgesia among pregnant women in a Nigerian tertiary hospital setting in order to suggest ways of improving the utilization of same. AIM &

objectivesTo assess the knowledge and percerption of women regarding epidural analgesia for labour in the antenatal clinics.

settingUniversity of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Southsouth Nigeria.

methodsA total of 420 women attending the antenatal clinics of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital in South-south Nigeria were interviewed using semi-structured researcher-administered questionnaires. Respondents' socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge of epidural analgesia and its acceptance were obtained, documented and analyzed.

resultsFour hundred and five (94.6%) out of 420 gave complete responses to the questions asked. A majority of the respondents 322(79.5%) were not aware of epidural analgesia. Of the 83(20.9%) who were aware, 22.9% knew it was used to relieve labour pain and 20(24.1%) had first knowledge about epidural analgesia from health workers. A majority of the respondents 310(76.5%) would accept epidural analgesia if offered to them. The level of education and previous labour experiences were statistically significantly associated with awareness and acceptance of epidural analgesia respectively (p = 0.000).

conclusionThis study has shown that there is poor awareness and acceptance of epidural analgesia in labour in this environment which would be greatly improved by public enlightenment and counselling during ante-natal visits.

Indexed as

Epidural analgesiaLabourPregnant womenSouthsouth NigeriaTertiary hospital

Identifiers

PMID27182515
PMCPMC4866730
OpenAlexW2517884609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.