Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182185›Full record

ArticleSouthern communication journal

Structuring Health in Colorectal Cancer Screening Conversations: An Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems.

Heather Canary, Connie Bullis, Jennifer Cummings, Anita Y Kinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern communication journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather CanaryDepartment of Communication, University of Utah.
Connie BullisDepartment of Communication, University of Utah.
Jennifer CummingsCummings, Management Department, University of Utah.
Anita Y KinneyDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, and University of New Mexico Cancer Center.

Funding

Impact of Remote Familial Risk Assessment and CounselingR01CA125194 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KINNEY, ANITA Y. · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used structurating activity theory to analyze 21 conversations between genetic counselors and individuals at increased risk for familial colorectal cancer (CRC). The qualitative analysis revealed ways elements of family, primary healthcare, cancer prevention and treatment, and other systems emerged in intervention conversations as shaping CRC screening attitudes and behaviors. Results indicate that family stories, norms, and roles are resources for enacting health practices in families and that the authority of healthcare providers is a resource for making screening decisions. Conclusions include practical implications for using findings in clinical applications as well as future research directions to build on this exploratory study.

Identifiers

PMID27182185
PMCPMC4865265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.