ReviewVeterinary world2016
Advances in reproductive biotechnologies.
Review in Veterinary world, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Off-Season Reproductive Performance of Tsurcana Ewes Under Five Estrous Induction Protocols with Different Hormonal Profiles.Biology · 2025Article
- Development of Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for the Superovulation of Cattle: A Review.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- Use of Natural Biomolecules in Animal Feed to Enhance Livestock Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bovine oocyte activation with bull or human sperm by conventional ICSI and Piezo-ICSI: Its relationship with PLCɀ activity.Open veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Cryopreservation and Transfer of Sheep Embryos Recovered at Different Stages of Development and Cryopreserved Using Different Techniques.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Resurrecting biodiversity: advanced assisted reproductive technologies and biobanking.Reproduction & fertility · 2022Review
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advancements in the Field of Animal Reproduction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Establishment of a Wisent (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Serum biochemical profile in buffalo endometritis and impact of treatment with PGF2α and intrauterine gentamicin infusion on postpartum reproductive performance.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
- Boar seminal plasma: current insights on its potential role for assisted reproductive technologies in swine.Animal reproduction · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent times, reproductive biotechnologies have emerged and started to replace the conventional techniques. It is noteworthy that for sustained livestock productivity, it is imperative to start using these techniques for facing the increasing challenges for productivity, reproduction and health with impending environment conditions. These recent biotechniques, both in male and female, have revolutionized and opened avenues for studying and manipulating the reproductive process both in vitro and in vivo in various livestock species for improving tis efficiency. This review attempts to highlight pros and cons, on the recent developments in reproductive biotechnologies, both in male and female in livestock species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.