Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27182031›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes investigation2016

Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec dosed flexibly at convenient times vs fixed dosing at the same time each day in a Japanese cohort with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 26-week, treat-to-target trial.

Takashi Kadowaki, Hideaki Jinnouchi, Kohei Kaku, Malene L Hersløv, Jacob Hyllested-Winge, Shuji Nakamura

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01880736 (A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01880736 phase3completednot on this map

A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2013 to 2014Enrolled458ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsinsulin degludec
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. In-Hospital Management of Hyperglycemia: The Role of Insulin Degludec.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. A Large Difference in Dose Timing of Basal Insulin Introduces Risk of Hypoglycemia and Overweight: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Takashi KadowakiDepartment of Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Hideaki JinnouchiIryo Houjin Shadan Jinnouchikai, Jinnouchi Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kohei KakuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Malene L HersløvMedical & Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Jacob Hyllested-WingeMedical & Scientific Affairs, Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji NakamuraIryo Houjin Shadan Kowakai Heiwadai Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionThis trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the possibility of varying the daily injection time of once-daily, long-acting basal insulin degludec (IDeg) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin glargine. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a 26-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target trial, with a 2 × 2 factorial design comparing IDeg flexible (allowing dosing ±8 h from an agreed dosing time) with IDeg fixed dosing (at the same time each day). It was carried out in 458 adult patients who were inadequately controlled on insulin glargine with or without oral antidiabetic drugs.

resultsThe majority of doses were taken within 2 h of the agreed dosing time, showing a high level of adherence among Japanese patients. After 26 weeks, IDeg flexible was non-inferior to IDeg fixed with respect to change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline, estimated treatment difference 0.08% points (95% confidence interval -0.05; 0.22). Fasting plasma glucose decreased to a similar level with IDeg flexible and IDeg fixed, estimated treatment difference -0.18 mmol/L (95% confidence interval -0.48; 0.12). The rates of confirmed and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia were numerically, but not significantly, higher with IDeg flexible vs IDeg fixed dosing. The rates of adverse events with IDeg flexible and IDeg fixed dosing were similar.

conclusionsThese results showed the efficacy and safety of allowing patients to vary the time they dosed IDeg, when necessary, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Dosing of IDeg at a time convenient to the patient was non-inferior, with respect to glycated hemoglobin, to dosing at the same time each day.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Long-ActingJapanMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin, Long-ActingBasal insulinClinical trialType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID27182031
PMCPMC5009133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.