Trial reportJournal of diabetes investigation2016
Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec dosed flexibly at convenient times vs fixed dosing at the same time each day in a Japanese cohort with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 26-week, treat-to-target trial.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01880736 (A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible vs. Fixed Dosing and Simple vs. Stepwise Titration With Once Daily Insulin Degludec in Inadequately Treated Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec dosed flexibly at convenient times vs fixed dosing at the same time each day in a Japanese cohort with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 26-week, treat-to-target trial.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2016Trial
- In-Hospital Management of Hyperglycemia: The Role of Insulin Degludec.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Review
- Pharmacoeconomic Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus: Outcomes and Analysis of Health Benefits Approach.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Review
- Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Review
- Article
- A Large Difference in Dose Timing of Basal Insulin Introduces Risk of Hypoglycemia and Overweight: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017Article
- Insulin degludec in a simple or stepwise titration algorithm in a Japanese population of patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 26-week, treat-to-target trial.Diabetology international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionThis trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the possibility of varying the daily injection time of once-daily, long-acting basal insulin degludec (IDeg) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin glargine. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a 26-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target trial, with a 2 × 2 factorial design comparing IDeg flexible (allowing dosing ±8 h from an agreed dosing time) with IDeg fixed dosing (at the same time each day). It was carried out in 458 adult patients who were inadequately controlled on insulin glargine with or without oral antidiabetic drugs.
resultsThe majority of doses were taken within 2 h of the agreed dosing time, showing a high level of adherence among Japanese patients. After 26 weeks, IDeg flexible was non-inferior to IDeg fixed with respect to change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline, estimated treatment difference 0.08% points (95% confidence interval -0.05; 0.22). Fasting plasma glucose decreased to a similar level with IDeg flexible and IDeg fixed, estimated treatment difference -0.18 mmol/L (95% confidence interval -0.48; 0.12). The rates of confirmed and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia were numerically, but not significantly, higher with IDeg flexible vs IDeg fixed dosing. The rates of adverse events with IDeg flexible and IDeg fixed dosing were similar.
conclusionsThese results showed the efficacy and safety of allowing patients to vary the time they dosed IDeg, when necessary, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Dosing of IDeg at a time convenient to the patient was non-inferior, with respect to glycated hemoglobin, to dosing at the same time each day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.