ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2016
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The MilSeq Project: Enabling Personalized Medicine Through Exome Sequencing in the U.S. Air Force
Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Polygenic Risk Scoring for Common Diseases in Primary Care
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review.BMC pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening.PloS one · 2018Trial
- The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2017Trial
- Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.Pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Artificial Intelligence in genomics: a comprehensive survey of methods, resources, challenges, and prospects.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- The Surviving, Not Thriving, Photoreceptors in Patients withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Combined bioinformatic and splicing analysis of likely benign intronic and synonymous variants reveals evidence for pathogenicity.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Far from Home: Managing Incidental Findings in Field Research with Portable MRI.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024Article
- Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023Review
- Blurred Boundaries: Toward an Expanded Ethics of Research and Clinical Care.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023Article
- Parents' Perspectives on Secondary Genetic Ancestry Findings in Pediatric Genomic Medicine.Clinical therapeutics · 2023Article
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- WGS Data Collections: How Do Genomic Databases Transform Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Impact of returning unsolicited genomic results to nongenetic health care providers in the eMERGE III Network.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument Development.The patient · 2022Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
65 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite rapid technical progress and demonstrable effectiveness for some types of diagnosis and therapy, much remains to be learned about clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) and its role within the practice of medicine. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium includes 18 extramural research projects, one National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project, and a coordinating center funded by the NHGRI and National Cancer Institute. The consortium is exploring analytic and clinical validity and utility, as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of sequencing via multidisciplinary approaches; it has thus far recruited 5,577 participants across a spectrum of symptomatic and healthy children and adults by utilizing both germline and cancer sequencing. The CSER consortium is analyzing data and creating publically available procedures and tools related to participant preferences and consent, variant classification, disclosure and management of primary and secondary findings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records. Future research directions will refine measures of clinical utility of CGES in both germline and somatic testing, evaluate the use of CGES for screening in healthy individuals, explore the penetrance of pathogenic variants through extensive phenotyping, reduce discordances in public databases of genes and variants, examine social and ethnic disparities in the provision of genomics services, explore regulatory issues, and estimate the value and downstream costs of sequencing. The CSER consortium has established a shared community of research sites by using diverse approaches to pursue the evidence-based development of best practices in genomic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.