Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2016
Indacaterol-Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol-Fluticasone for COPD.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 342 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 52-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel-group, Active Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of QVA149 (Indacaterol Maleate / Glycopyrronium Bromide) With Salmeterol/Fluticasone on the Rate of Exacerbations in Subjects With Moderate to Very Severe COPD. (FLAME).
An 8-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of CHF 718 pMDI (HFA Beclomethasone Dipropionate Via Pressured Metered Dose Inhaler) in Asthmatic Subjects.
A 6-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 5259 pMDI (HFA Glycopyrronium Bromide Via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-controlled, Incomplete Block Cross-over, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of CHF 1531 pMDI (Formoterol Fumarate) in Asthmatic Subjects
Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol vs. Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients With COPD-asthma Phenotype vs. Emphysema Phenotype. A Controled Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
342 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 861 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Association between inhaled corticosteroids and risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy and pharmacological mechanism of Bailing capsule on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis and network pharmacology.Pharmaceutical biology · 2024Pooled it
- Intraclass comparison of inhaled corticosteroids for the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of fracture risk in inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of ICS versus Non-ICS Combination Therapy in COPD: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Pooled it
- Association between ICS use and risk of hyperglycemia in COPD patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review on long-term adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Pooled it
- Triple versus LAMA/LABA combination therapy for patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2021Pooled it
- Mepolizumab for Eosinophil-Associated COPD: Analysis of METREX and METREO.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021Pooled it
- Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2020Pooled it
- Romanian clinical guideline for diagnosis and treatment of COPD.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Guideline
- Impact of smoking status on the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Decline of COPD exacerbations in clinical trials over two decades - a systematic review and meta-regression.Respiratory research · 2019Pooled it
- Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Bronchodilators for the Management of COPD: Global and Asian Perspectives.Advances in therapy · 2019Pooled it
- Inhaled siRNA therapy targeting RAGE for pulmonary inflammation: a first-in-human randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Dupilumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pooled analysis of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and systemic corticosteroid use.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Trial
282 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost guidelines recommend either a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) plus an inhaled glucocorticoid or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) as the first-choice treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have a high risk of exacerbations. The role of treatment with a LABA-LAMA regimen in these patients is unclear.
methodsWe conducted a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial. Patients who had COPD with a history of at least one exacerbation during the previous year were randomly assigned to receive, by inhalation, either the LABA indacaterol (110 μg) plus the LAMA glycopyrronium (50 μg) once daily or the LABA salmeterol (50 μg) plus the inhaled glucocorticoid fluticasone (500 μg) twice daily. The primary outcome was the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations.
resultsA total of 1680 patients were assigned to the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group, and 1682 to the salmeterol-fluticasone group. Indacaterol-glycopyrronium showed not only noninferiority but also superiority to salmeterol-fluticasone in reducing the annual rate of all COPD exacerbations; the rate was 11% lower in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (3.59 vs. 4.03; rate ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.96; P=0.003). The indacaterol-glycopyrronium group had a longer time to the first exacerbation than did the salmeterol-fluticasone group (71 days [95% CI, 60 to 82] vs. 51 days [95% CI, 46 to 57]; hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.91], representing a 16% lower risk; P<0.001). The annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was lower in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (0.98 vs. 1.19; rate ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91; P<0.001), and the time to the first moderate or severe exacerbation was longer in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group than in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.86; P<0.001), as was the time to the first severe exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00; P=0.046). The effect of indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus salmeterol-fluticasone on the rate of COPD exacerbations was independent of the baseline blood eosinophil count. The incidence of adverse events and deaths was similar in the two groups. The incidence of pneumonia was 3.2% in the indacaterol-glycopyrronium group and 4.8% in the salmeterol-fluticasone group (P=0.02).
conclusionsIndacaterol-glycopyrronium was more effective than salmeterol-fluticasone in preventing COPD exacerbations in patients with a history of exacerbation during the previous year. (Funded by Novartis; FLAME ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01782326.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.