Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27181389›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2016

Stratification of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients into risk levels using somatic mutations.

Donghai Dai, Kristina W Thiel, Erin A Salinas, Michael J Goodheart, Kimberly K Leslie, Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donghai DaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Kristina W ThielDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Erin A SalinasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Michael J GoodheartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Kimberly K LeslieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Jesus Gonzalez BosquetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: jesus-gonzalezbosquet@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Targeted Therapy for Endometrial CancerR01CA099908 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LESLIE, KIMBERLY K. · 2002 to 2023
$5.8M
MTDH regulates Fanconi anemia repair pathway to mediate drug resistanceR01CA184101 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LESLIE, KIMBERLY K., MENG, XIANGBING · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099908NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with endometrioid endometrial cancer are stratified as high risk and low risk for extrauterine disease by surgical staging. Since patients with low-grade, minimally invasive disease do not benefit from comprehensive staging, pre-surgery stratification into a risk category may prevent unnecessary surgical staging in low risk patients. Our objective was to develop a predictive model to identify risk levels using somatic mutations that could be used preoperatively.

methodsWe classified endometrioid endometrial cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset into high risk and low risk categories: high risk patients presented with stage II, III or IV disease or stage I with high-intermediate risk features, whereas low risk patients consisted of the remaining stage I patients with either no myometrial invasion or low-intermediate risk features. Three strategies were used to build the prediction model: 1) mutational status for each gene; 2) number of somatic mutations for each gene; and 3) variant allele frequencies for each somatic mutation for each gene.

resultsEach prediction strategy had a good performance, with an area under the curve (or AUC) between 61% and 80%. Analysis of variant allele frequency produced a superior prediction model for risk levels of endometrial cancer as compared to the other two strategies, with an AUC=91%. Lasso and Ridge methods identified 53 mutations that together had the highest predictability for high risk endometrioid endometrial cancer.

conclusionsThis prediction model will assist future retrospective and prospective studies to categorize endometrial cancer patients into high risk and low risk in the preoperative setting.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticMutationAgedCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsExomeFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasm StagingPrecision MedicineRetrospective StudiesRiskROC CurveEndometrial cancerIndividualized treatmentPrediction modelRisk levelsSomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID27181389
PMCPMC5257080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.