Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27180983›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2016

Preclinical PK/PD model for combined administration of erlotinib and sunitinib in the treatment of A549 human NSCLC xenograft mice.

Jing-Yun Li, Yu-Peng Ren, Yin Yuan, Shuang-Min Ji, Shu-Pei Zhou, Li-Jie Wang, Zhen-Zhen Mou, Liang Li, Wei Lu, Tian-Yan Zhou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing-Yun LiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yu-Peng RenDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yin YuanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shuang-Min JiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shu-Pei ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Animal Science, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Li-Jie WangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhen-Zhen MouDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Liang LiState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Wei LuState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Tian-Yan ZhouState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCombined therapy of EGFR TKI and VEGFR TKI may produce a greater therapeutic benefit and overcome EGFR TKI-induced resistance. However, a previous study shows that a combination of EGFR TKI erlotinib (ER) with VEGFR TKI sunitinib (SU) did not improve the overall survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study we examined the anticancer effect of ER, SU and their combination in the treatment of A549 human NSCLC xenograft mice, and conducted PK/PD modeling and simulations to optimize the dose regimen.

methodsER (20, 50 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1)) or SU (5, 10, 20 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1)) alone, or their combination were administered to BALB/c nude mice bearing A549 tumors for 22 days. The tumor size and body weight were recorded daily. The experimental data were used to develop PK/PD models describing the quantitative relationship between the plasma concentrations and tumor suppression in different dose regimens. The models were further evaluated and validated, and used to predict the efficacy of different combination regimens and to select the optimal regimen.

resultsThe in vivo anticancer efficacy of the combination groups was much stronger than that of either drug administered alone. A PK/PD model was developed with a combination index (φ) of 4.4, revealing a strong synergistic effect between ER and SU. The model simulation predicted the tumor growth in different dosage regimens, and showed that the dose of SU played a decisive role in the combination treatment, and suggested that a lower dose of ER (≤5 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1)) and adjusting the dose of SU might yield a better dosage regimen for clinical research.

conclusionThe experimental data and modeling confirm synergistic anticancer effect of ER and SU in the treatment of A549 xenograft mice. The optimal dosage regimen determined by the PK/PD modeling and simulation can be used in future preclinical study and provide a reference for clinical application.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungComputer SimulationDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug SynergismErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleIndolesLung NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudePyrrolesSunitinibXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysErlotinib HydrochlorideIndolesPyrrolesSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID27180983
PMCPMC4933764
OpenAlexW2399972022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.