ArticleJournal of health care for the poor and underserved2016
Building a "Deep Fund of Good Will": Reframing Research Engagement.
Article in Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies for recruiting participants underrepresented in clinical research: A scoping review.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- "My Blood, You Know, My Biology Being out There…": Consent and Participant Control of Biological Samples.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- Just Research: Evaluation findings of an educational program to promote inclusive research among investigators and research staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- "I Want to Know Everything ... ": The Return of Research Results and the Importance of Transparency in the Acceptability of Lumbar Punctures for African American Older Adults.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Applications of an Equity Framework in COVID-19 Vaccine Trial and Distribution Planning.Health equity · 2022Article
- Setting and motivation in the decision to participate: An approach to the engagement of diverse samples in mobile research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- Recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in Alzheimer's disease research: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2019Review
- The Health Equity Leadership Institute (HELI): Developing workforce capacity for health disparities research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe engagement of underrepresented populations in health research has been an ongoing challenge. Yet, the participation of these groups is recognized as key to health equity.
methodsSemi-structured interviews with 31 experienced investigators successful in the recruitment of underrepresented minorities were analyzed with reference to the concept of social capital to determine: 1) if it is actually in use by successful researchers although yet unidentified as such; and 2) if the rubric could shed light on new directions especially for those who find it difficult to implement community-engaged recruitment methods systematically.
resultsFindings indicate that some elements of the concept of social capital are being used successfully, but that there are also substantial barriers to its full implementation.
conclusionA lack of enforceable trust and associated institutional support for researchers is a detriment to research engagement. Efforts to remedy this would benefit large research projects, including clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.