Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27180560›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2017

The role of brachytherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

Eric Barbarite, Justin T Sick, Emmanuel Berchmans, Amade Bregy, Ashish H Shah, Nagy Elsayyad, Ricardo J Komotar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging nanoplatforms towards microenvironment-responsive glioma therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric BarbariteDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, USA.
Justin T SickThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Emmanuel BerchmansDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, USA.
Amade BregyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, USA.
Ashish H ShahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, USA.
Nagy ElsayyadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ricardo J KomotarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, USA. rkomotar@med.miami.edu.
Neurological Surgery · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brachytherapy (BT) for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) involves the use of radioactive isotopes to deliver ionizing radiation directly into the tumor bed. Its application as a means to prolong survival in GBM patients over the past few decades has come with variable success. The objective of this review is to describe the utility of BT in GBM, and to report the outcomes and adverse events associated with its use in different multimodal treatment approaches. A search of the literature was conducted using the PubMed database. The most recent search was performed in September 2015. Thirty-two series involving 1571 patients were included in our review. The longest median overall survival (MOS) following BT for newly diagnosed GBM reached 28.5 months. Overall, 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 46-89 %, 20-57 %, and 14-27 %. For recurrent GBM, the longest reported MOS after BT was 15.9 months. One-, 2- and 3-year survival rates for recurrent GBM were 10-66 %, 3-23 %, and 9-15 %. Adverse events were reported in 27 % of patients. Reoperation for radiation necrosis occurred in 4 and 27 % of patients following low- and high-dose rate BT, respectively. BT is a feasible option for extending survival in carefully selected GBM patients. As patient outcomes and overall survival improve with more aggressive radiotherapy, so does the risk of radiation-related complications. The most effective use of BT is likely as a part of multimodal treatment with other novel therapies.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyGlioblastomaHumansTreatment OutcomeBrachytherapyGlioblastomaOutcomesSide effectsSystematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID27180560
OpenAlexW2351251028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.