Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27180227›Full record

ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2016

Monitoring of newborns at high risk for brain injury.

Francesco Pisani, Carlotta Spagnoli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Expert consensus on grading management of electroencephalogram monitoring in neonates.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco PisaniChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Carlotta SpagnoliChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. carlotta.spagnoli@gmail.com.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increasing number of surviving preterm newborns and to the recognition of therapeutic hypothermia as the current gold standard in newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of brain monitoring tools in newborns at high risk for neurological disorders.Among the most frequent neurological conditions and presentations in the neonatal period, neonatal seizures and neonatal status epilepticus, paroxysmal non-epileptic motor phenomena, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, white matter injury of prematurity and stroke require specific approaches to diagnosis. In this review we will describe the characteristics, aims, indications and limitations of routinely available diagnostic techniques such as conventional and amplitude-integrated EEG, evoked potentials, cranial ultrasound and brain MRI. We will conclude by briefly outlining potential future perspectives from research studies.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureBrain InjuriesElectroencephalographyFemaleGestational AgeHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicMultimodal ImagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentSurvival RateDiagnosisEEGEvoked potentialsHypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathyMonitoringNeonatal neurologyNeonatal seizuresNeuroimagingNewbornStroke

Identifiers

PMID27180227
PMCPMC4867092
OpenAlexW2357894166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.