Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27180100›Full record

ReviewALTEX2016

Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.

Uwe Marx, Tommy B Andersson, Anthony Bahinski, Mario Beilmann, Sonja Beken, Flemming R Cassee, Murat Cirit, Mardas Daneshian, Susan Fitzpatrick, Olivier Frey and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ALTEX, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Data-Driven SustainableACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The Development of 3D Primary Co-Culture Models of the Human Airway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Uwe MarxTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Tommy B AnderssonAstraZeneca, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Innovative Medicines and Early Development Biotech Unit, Mölndal, Sweden.
Anthony BahinskiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University Boston, USA.
Mario BeilmannBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Non-clinical Drug Safety, Biberach, Germany.
Sonja BekenFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.
Flemming R CasseeNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Murat CiritMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Mardas DaneshianCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Susan FitzpatrickUS Food and Drugs Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, USA.
Olivier FreyETH Zurich, Dept. Biosystems Science and Engineering, Bio Engineering Laboratory, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudia Gaertnermicrofluidic ChipShop GmbH, Jena, Germany.
Christoph GieseProBioGen AG, Berlin, Germany.
Linda GriffithMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Minne B HeringaNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Julia HoengPhilip Morris International R&D, Neuchatal, Switzerland.
Wim H de JongNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Hajime KojimaJapanese Center for Validation of Animal Methods, Tokyo, Japan.
Jochen KuehnlBeiersdorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marcel LeistCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Andreas LuchGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Chemicals and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Ilka MaschmeyerTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Dmitry SakharovScientific Research Centre Bioclinicum, Moscow, Russia.
Adrienne J A M SipsNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Thomas Steger-HartmannBayer, Investigational Toxicology, Berlin, Germany.
Danilo A TagleNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Alexander TonevitskyNational Center of Medical Radiological Research, Moscow, Russia.
Tewes TralauGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Chemicals and Product Safety, Berlin, Germany.
Sergej TsybRussian Ministry of Production and Trade, Moscow, Russia.
Anja van de StolpeThe Institute for Human Organ and Disease Model Technologies, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob VandebrielNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Paul VultoMIMETAS BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jufeng WangChinese National Center for Safety Evaluation for Drugs, Beijing, China.
Joachim Wiestcellasys GmbH, Kronburg, Germany.
Marleen RodenburgNational Institute for Public Health & the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Adrian RothF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Roche Innovation Centre Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Small molecule screening programZ01HG200319 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2004 to 2008
$32.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HG200319Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advent of microphysiological systems - microfluidic biomimetic devices that aspire to emulate the biology of human tissues, organs and circulation in vitro - is envisaged to enable a global paradigm shift in drug development. An extraordinary US governmental initiative and various dedicated research programs in Europe and Asia have led recently to the first cutting-edge achievements of human single-organ and multi-organ engineering based on microphysiological systems. The expectation is that test systems established on this basis would model various disease stages, and predict toxicity, immunogenicity, ADME profiles and treatment efficacy prior to clinical testing. Consequently, this technology could significantly affect the way drug substances are developed in the future. Furthermore, microphysiological system-based assays may revolutionize our current global programs of prioritization of hazard characterization for any new substances to be used, for example, in agriculture, food, ecosystems or cosmetics, thus, replacing laboratory animal models used currently. Thirty-six experts from academia, industry and regulatory bodies present here the results of an intensive workshop (held in June 2015, Berlin, Germany). They review the status quo of microphysiological systems available today against industry needs, and assess the broad variety of approaches with fit-for-purpose potential in the drug development cycle. Feasible technical solutions to reach the next levels of human biology in vitro are proposed. Furthermore, key organ-on-a-chip case studies, as well as various national and international programs are highlighted. Finally, a roadmap into the future is outlined, to allow for more predictive and regulatory-accepted substance testing on a global scale.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsCell LineHazardous SubstancesStem CellsToxicity TestsHazardous Substancesdrug testingin vitro modelsmicrophysiological systemsorgan-on-a-chippredictive toxicology

Identifiers

PMID27180100
PMCPMC5396467
OpenAlexW2373100661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.