Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27180088›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016

The SOMATICS collaborative: Introduction to a National Institute on Drug Abuse cooperative study of pharmacotherapy for opioid treatment in criminal justice settings.

Redonna K Chandler, Matthew S Finger, David Farabee, Robert P Schwartz, Timothy Condon, Laura J Dunlap, Gary A Zarkin, Kathryn McCollister, Ryan D McDonald, Eugene Laska and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Redonna K ChandlerDivision of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, United States. Electronic address: redonna.chandler@nih.gov.
Matthew S FingerDivision of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, United States.
David FarabeeUCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Robert P SchwartzFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Timothy CondonCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, The University of New Mexico, United States.
Laura J DunlapRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Gary A ZarkinRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Kathryn McCollisterUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Ryan D McDonaldDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, United States.
Eugene LaskaDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, United States.
David BennettUCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Sharon M KellyFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Maureen HillhouseUCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
Shannon G MitchellFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kevin E O'GradyUniversity of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.
Joshua D LeeDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, United States.
Friends Research Institute · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USRTI International · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Extended-Release Naltrexone Opioid Treatment at Jail-to-Community Re-entryU01DA033336 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEE, JOSHUA D · 2013 to 2018
$3.5M
Depot Pharmacotherapies for Opioid-Dependent Offenders: Outcomes and CostsU01DA034743 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FARABEE, DAVID J · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
A Randomized Trial of Interim Methadone and Patient Navigation Initiated in JailU01DA013636 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA013636NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA033336NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA034743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong the nearly 750,000 inmates in U.S. jails, 12% report using opioids regularly, 8% report use in the month prior to their offense, and 4% report use at the time of their offense. Although ample evidence exists that medications effectively treat Opiate Use Disorder (OUD) in the community, strong evidence is lacking in jail settings. The general lack of medications for OUD in jail settings may place persons suffering from OUD at high risk for relapse to drug use and overdose following release from jail.

methodsThe three study sites in this collaborative are pooling data for secondary analyses from three open-label randomized effectiveness trials comparing: (1) the initiation of extended-release naltrexone [XR-NTX] in Sites 1 and 2 and interim methadone in Site 3 with enhanced treatment-as usual (ETAU); (2) the additional benefit of patient navigation plus medications at Sites 2 and 3 vs. medication alone vs. ETAU. Participants are adults with OUD incarcerated in jail and transitioning to the community.

resultsWe describe the rationale, specific aims, and designs of three separate studies harmonized to enhance their scientific yield to investigate how to best prevent jail inmates from relapsing to opioid use and associated problems as they transition back to the community.

conclusionsConducting drug abuse research during incarceration is challenging and study designs with data harmonization across different sites can increase the potential value of research to develop effective treatments for individuals in jail with OUD.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationPrisonersAnalgesics, OpioidCooperative BehaviorCriminal LawDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansInjections, IntramuscularMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsNational Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.)Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrisonsTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsCriminal justiceExtended-release naltrexoneInterim methadoneJailOpioid relapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID27180088
PMCPMC5454801
OpenAlexW2380011675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.