Trial reportJAMA2016
Effect of Aspirin on Development of ARDS in At-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: The LIPS-A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01504867 (LIPS-A), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LIPS-A: Lung Injury Prevention Study With Aspirin
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in acute viral respiratory tract infections: An updated systematic review.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Pooled it
- Association Between Prior Aspirin Use and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Incidence in At-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Guideline
- The preventive effect of antiplatelet therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Quantifying the Effects of Prior Acetyl-Salicylic Acid on Sepsis-Related Deaths: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis Using Propensity Matching.Critical care medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Multicenter randomized trial assessing efficacy and safety of aerosolized dornase Alfa in COVID-19 ARDS.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Inflammatory subphenotypes in patients at risk of ARDS: evidence from the LIPS-A trial.Intensive care medicine · 2023Trial
- Inhaled prostacyclin therapy in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.Respiratory research · 2023Trial
- Statin and aspirin as adjuvant therapy in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised clinical trial (RESIST trial).BMC infectious diseases · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Nebulised heparin for patients with or at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2021Trial
- Effect of aspirin on deaths associated with sepsis in healthy older people (ANTISEPSIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2021Trial
- The ABO histo-blood group, endothelial activation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome risk in critical illness.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Trial
- Cytokine and lipid metabolome effects of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in critically ill patients with systemic inflammation: a pilot, feasibility, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Trial
- The Association between Prehospital Vulnerability, ARDS Development, and Mortality among At-Risk Adults. Results from the LIPS-A Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Vitamin D to Prevent Lung Injury Following Esophagectomy-A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Critical care medicine · 2018Trial
- Aspirin reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in human models of ARDS.Thorax · 2017Trial
- Randomized Clinical Trial of a Combination of an Inhaled Corticosteroid and Beta Agonist in Patients at Risk of Developing the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Critical care medicine · 2017Trial
- Is acute respiratory distress syndrome a preventable disease?Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceManagement of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains largely supportive. Whether early intervention can prevent development of ARDS remains unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of early aspirin administration for the prevention of ARDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 US academic hospitals. Between January 2, 2012, and November 17, 2014, 7673 patients at risk for ARDS (Lung Injury Prediction Score ≥4) in the emergency department were screened and 400 were randomized. Ten patients were excluded, leaving 390 in the final modified intention-to-treat analysis cohort.
interventionsAdministration of aspirin, 325-mg loading dose followed by 81 mg/d (n = 195) or placebo (n = 195) within 24 hours of emergency department presentation and continued to hospital day 7, discharge, or death. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the development of ARDS by study day 7. Secondary measures included ventilator-free days, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 28-day and 1-year survival, and change in serum biomarkers associated with ARDS. A final α level of .0737 (α = .10 overall) was required for statistical significance of the primary outcome.
resultsAmong 390 analyzed patients (median age, 57 years; 187 [48%] women), the median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 6 3-10) days. Administration of aspirin, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of ARDS at 7 days (10.3% vs 8.7%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.24 [92.6% CI, 0.67 to 2.31], P = .53). No significant differences were seen in secondary outcomes: ventilator-free to day 28, mean (SD), 24.9 (7.4) days vs 25.2 (7.0) days (mean [90% CI] difference, -0.26 [-1.46 to 0.94] days; P = .72); ICU length of stay, mean (SD), 5.2 (7.0) days vs 5.4 (7.0) days (mean [90% CI] difference, -0.16 [-1.75 to 1.43] days; P = .87); hospital length of stay, mean (SD), 8.8 (10.3) days vs 9.0 (9.9) days (mean [90% CI] difference, -0.27 [-1.96 to 1.42] days; P = .79); or 28-day survival, 90% vs 90% (hazard ratio [90% CI], 1.03 [0.60 to 1.79]; P = .92) or 1-year survival, 73% vs 75% (hazard ratio [90% CI], 1.06 [0.75 to 1.50]; P = .79). Bleeding-related adverse events were infrequent in both groups (aspirin vs placebo, 5.6% vs 2.6%; odds ratio [90% CI], 2.27 [0.92 to 5.61]; P = .13).
resultsAmong 390 analyzed patients (median age, 57 years; 187 [48%] women), median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 6 (3-10) days. Administration of aspirin, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of ARDS at 7 days (OR, 1.24; 92.6%CI, 0.67-2.31). No significant differences were seen in secondary outcomes or adverse events. [table: see text] CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among at-risk patients presenting to the ED, the use of aspirin compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of ARDS at 7 days. The findings of this phase 2b trial do not support continuation to a larger phase 3 trial.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01504867.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.