Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2016
Analysis of cardio-pulmonary and respiratory kinetics in different body positions: impact of venous return on pulmonary measurements.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Starting Positions and Breathing Rhythms on Cardiopulmonary Stress and Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption after High-Intensity Metabolic Training: A Randomized Crossover Prospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Lower Body Negative Pressure on Phase I Cardiovascular Responses at Exercise Onset.International journal of sports medicine · 2020Article
- Temporal dissociation between muscle and pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics: influences of perfusion dynamics and arteriovenous oxygen concentration differences in muscles and lungs.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Article
- Impact of 60 days of 6° head down tilt bed rest on muscular oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics: efficacy of a reactive sledge jump countermeasure.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to compare the kinetics responses of heart rate (HR), pulmonary ([Formula: see text]O2pulm), and muscular ([Formula: see text]O2musc) oxygen uptake during dynamic leg exercise across different body positions (-6°, 45°, and 75°).
methodsTen healthy individuals [six men, four women; age 23.4 ± 2.8 years; height 179.7 ± 8.3 cm; body mass 73 ± 12 kg (mean ± SD)] completed pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) work rate (WR) changes between 30 and 80 W in each posture. HR was measured beat-to-beat by echocardiogram and [Formula: see text]O2pulm by breath-by-breath gas exchange. [Formula: see text]O2musc kinetics were assessed by the procedure of Hoffmann et al. (Eur J Appl Physiol 113:1745-1754, 2013) applying a circulatory model and cross-correlation functions (CCF).
resultsFor [Formula: see text]O2pulm kinetics significant differences between -6° (CCF-values: 0.292 ± 0.040) and 45° (0.256 ± 0.034; p < 0.01; n = 10) as well as between -6° and 75° (0.214 ± 0.057; p < 0.05; n = 10) were detected at lag '40 s' of the CCF course as interaction effects (factors: Lag × Posture). HR and [Formula: see text]O2musc kinetics yield no significant differences across the postures.
conclusionsThe analysis of cardio-dynamic and respiratory kinetics, especially with an emphasis on muscular and cellular level, has to consider venous return and cardiac output distortions. Simplified observations of kinetics responses resulting in time constants and time delays only should be replaced by the time-series analysis for a more sophisticated evaluation. The results illustrate that isolated [Formula: see text]O2pulm measurements without cardio-dynamic influences may not represent the kinetics responses originally revealed at muscular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.