Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27179350›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of STD & AIDS2017

Self-collected genital swabs compared with cervicovaginal lavage for measuring HIV-1 and HSV-2 and the effect of acyclovir on viral shedding.

Janet M McNicholl, Wanna Leelawiwat, Sara Whitehead, Debra L Hanson, Tammy Evans-Strickfaden, Chen Y Cheng, Wannee Chonwattana, Famui Mueanpai, Chonticha Kittinunvorakoon, Lauri Markowitz and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Janet M McNicholl1 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Wanna Leelawiwat2 The Thai Ministry of Public Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sara Whitehead1 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Debra L Hanson1 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Tammy Evans-Strickfaden1 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Chen Y Cheng3 Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Wannee Chonwattana2 The Thai Ministry of Public Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Famui Mueanpai2 The Thai Ministry of Public Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Chonticha Kittinunvorakoon2 The Thai Ministry of Public Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Lauri Markowitz3 Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Eileen F Dunne3 Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV-1 and HSV-2 are frequent genital co-infections in women. To determine how self-collected genital swabs compare to provider-collected cervicovaginal lavage, paired self-collected genital swabs and cervicovaginal lavage from women co-infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2 were evaluated. Women were in an acyclovir clinical trial and their samples were tested for HIV-1 RNA (361 samples) and HSV-2 DNA (378 samples). Virus shedding, quantity and acyclovir effect were compared. HIV-1 and HSV-2 were more frequently detected in self-collected genital swabs: 74.5% of self-collected genital swabs and 63.6% of cervicovaginal lavage had detectable HIV-1 (p ≤ 0.001, Fisher's exact test) and 29.7% of self-collected genital swabs and 19.3% of cervicovaginal lavage had detectable HSV-2 (p ≤ 0.001) in the placebo month. Cervicovaginal lavage and self-collected genital swabs virus levels were correlated (Spearman's rho, 0.68 for HIV; 0.61 for HSV-2) and self-collected genital swabs levels were generally higher. In multivariate modeling, self-collected genital swabs and cervicovaginal lavage could equally detect the virus-suppressive effect of acyclovir: for HIV-1, proportional odds ratios were 0.42 and 0.47 and for HSV-2, they were 0.10 and 0.03 for self-collected genital swabs and cervicovaginal lavage, respectively. Self-collected genital swabs should be considered for detection and measurement of HIV-1 and HSV-2 in clinical trials and other studies as they are a sensitive method to detect virus and can be collected in the home with frequent sampling.

Indexed as

AcyclovirAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiviral AgentsCoinfectionFemaleHerpes GenitalisHerpesvirus 2, HumanHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansRetrospective StudiesThailandTherapeutic IrrigationViral LoadVirus SheddingAcyclovirAnti-Retroviral AgentsAntiviral Agentsano-genitalpolymerase chain reactionsamplingself-collectionsexually transmitted infectiontransmissionVirus

Identifiers

PMID27179350
PMCPMC5315198
OpenAlexW2384387541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.