ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2016
High Failure Rate of a Decellularized Osteochondral Allograft for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions.
Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05560477 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multi-Center, Phase 1/2b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AM3101 to Augment Meniscal Healing), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multi-Center, Phase 1/2b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AM3101 to Augment Meniscal Healing
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee.Cartilage · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of Donor Characteristics and Graft Storage Time with Survivorship of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee Using Extended Storage Modality Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System Versus Standard Preservation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Surface-based treatment options for cartilage lesions of the knee.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- Evaluation of cartilage regeneration using a hybrid bilayer scaffold based on omentum: evidence of limited efficacy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Development of bioactive solid-foam scaffolds from decellularized cartilage with chondrogenic and osteogenic properties.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Article
- Treatment of knee cartilage lesions in 2024: From hyaluronic acid to regenerative medicine.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Treating Articular Cartilage Defects: Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-analysis of Studies From 2001 to 2020.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Recent development in multizonal scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Osteochondral regenerative engineering: challenges, state-of-the-art and translational perspectives.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- An all-silk-derived bilayer hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Assessment of Outcomes After Multisurface Osteochondral Allograft Transplantations in the Knee.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Osteochondral Allografts in Knee Surgery: Narrative Review of Evidence to Date.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2022Review
- The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 Knee Score and Atlas.Cartilage · 2021Article
- Articular cartilage and osteochondral tissue engineering techniques: Recent advances and challenges.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Multi-layer cell-free scaffolds for osteochondral defects of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical evidence.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Review
- Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.Cartilage · 2021Article
- A Biomimetic Biphasic Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Cartilage and Decalcified Bone Matrixes for Osteochondral Defect Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWidespread adoption of fresh allograft transplantation remains limited, predominantly by supply issues. To overcome these limitations, a preshaped, cylindrical sterilized and decellularized osteochondral allograft (SDOCA) implant was recently introduced as a clinical treatment option. PURPOSE: To evaluate functional outcomes and graft survivorship among patients treated with the SDOCA implant for knee cartilage injuries. STUDY
designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsAn institutional review board-approved database was used to identify a series of patients with prospectively collected data who had been treated with the SDOCA implant. The surgeries were performed at 2 centers by 2 surgeons. Patient-reported outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the number and type of reoperations were assessed. Failure was defined as structural damage of the graft diagnosed by arthroscopy or MRI, and any reoperation resulting in removal of the allograft. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Marx Sports Activity Scale. MRI was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.
resultsThere were 32 patients with a mean age (±SD) of 35.1 ± 10.6 years; 59% were male. Twenty-three (72%) knees had previous surgery. The mean defect area (±SD) was 2.9 ± 2.0 cm(2), and the mean allograft size was 13.18 ± 2.3 mm (6 grafts ≤9 mm and 59 grafts ≥11 mm). The median number of allografts per knee was 2 (range, 1-5 grafts). Twenty-three of the 32 knees (72%) were considered failures by the definition detailed above. Of these, 14 knees (43%) had further surgery after the index procedure. Implant survivorship was 19.6% at 2 years. The mean follow-up duration was 1.29 years (range, 0.11-2.8 years). KOOS pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sports and recreation (sport/rec), and knee-related quality of life improved significantly from the preoperative visit to latest follow-up. Age was significantly predictive of failure, with a hazard ratio of 1.68 per 1 SD older (95% CI, 1.05-2.68; P = .030). The MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) feature effusion was the only score to correlate with KOOS (symptoms, pain, ADL, sport/rec).
conclusionThe SDOCA implant demonstrated a 72% failure rate within the first 2 years of implantation at these 2 institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.