ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017
Patient crossover and potentially avoidable repeat computed tomography exams across a health information exchange.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with imaging overuse in the emergency department: A systematic review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Influences on Emergency Clinician Use of Health Information Exchange: Interview Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Patterns of computed tomography utilisation in injury management: latent classes approach using linked administrative data in Western Australia.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Observational
- Towards the elimination of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Lancet Commission.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Review
- The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Mapping of HIE CT terms to LOINC®: analysis of content-dependent coverage and coverage improvement through new term creation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Hospitals' adoption of intra-system information exchange is negatively associated with inter-system information exchange.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- The LOINC RSNA radiology playbook - a unified terminology for radiology procedures.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Standard Lexicons, Coding Systems and Ontologies for Interoperability and Semantic Computation in Imaging.Journal of digital imaging · 2018Review
- Standard Anatomic Terminologies: Comparison for Use in a Health Information Exchange-Based Prior Computed Tomography (CT) Alerting System.JMIR medical informatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to measure the number of repeat computed tomography (CT) scans performed across an established health information exchange (HIE) in New York City. The long-term objective is to build an HIE-based duplicate CT alerting system to reduce potentially avoidable duplicate CTs.
methodsThis retrospective cohort analysis was based on HIE CT study records performed between March 2009 and July 2012. The number of CTs performed, the total number of patients receiving CTs, and the hospital locations where CTs were performed for each unique patient were calculated. Using a previously described process established by one of the authors, hospital-specific proprietary CT codes were mapped to the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC
resultsThere were 717 231 CTs performed on 349 321 patients. Of these patients, 339 821 had all of their imaging studies performed at a single location, accounting for 668 938 CTs. Of these, 9500 patients had 48 293 CTs performed at more than one location. Of these, 6284 patients had 24 978 CTs with the same LOINC code performed at multiple locations. The median time between studies with the same LOINC code was 232 days (range of 0 to 1227); however, 1327 were performed within 7 days and 5000 within 30 days.
conclusionsA small proportion (3%) of our cohort had CTs performed at more than one location, however this represents a large number of scans (48 293). A noteworthy portion of these CTs (51.7%) shared the same LOINC code and may represent potentially avoidable studies, especially those done within a short time frame. This represents an addressable issue, and future HIE-based alerts could be utilized to reduce potentially avoidable CT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.