Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178974›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

General practitioners' justifications for therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular prevention: an empirically grounded typology.

Jean-Pierre Lebeau, Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader, Hélène Vaillant-Roussel, Denis Pouchain, Virginie Yaouanc, Isabelle Aubin-Auger, Alain Mercier, Emmanuel Rusch, Roy Remmen, Etienne Vermeire and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00348855 (Effects of a Series of Intensified Prevention Consultations on the Changes in Goals and Risk Factors in Hypertensive Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00348855 phase4completednot on this map

Effects of a Series of Intensified Prevention Consultations on the Changes in Goals and Risk Factors in Hypertensive Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorCollège National des Généralistes EnseignantsRan2006 to 2010Enrolled1,836ConditionsHigh Risk Hypertensive PatientsArmsCardiovascular drugs strategies, Compliance, Exercise, Stop Smoking, Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical inertia and the 2017 ACA/AHA guideline.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
  11. Prevalence of primary aldosteronism in primary care: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Pierre LebeauDepartment of General Practice, EES Research Team, University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.
Jean-Sébastien CadwalladerDepartment of General Practice, University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.
Hélène Vaillant-RousselDepartment of General Practice, University of Auvergne. Faculté de Médecine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Denis PouchainDepartment of General Practice, University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.
Virginie YaouancCentre Hospitalier de Vendôme, Vendôme, France.
Isabelle Aubin-AugerDepartment of General Practice, REMES Research Team, University Paris Diderot. 16 rue Henri Huchard, Paris, France.
Alain MercierDepartment of General Practice, University Paris 13. UFR SMBH, Bobigny, France.
Emmanuel RuschDepartment of Public Health, EES Research team University of Tours. Faculté de Médecine, Tours, France.
Roy RemmenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp. Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Etienne VermeireDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp. Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Kristin HendrickxDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp. Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Université de Tours · FRUniversity of Antwerp · BEGénérale de Santé · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRWisdom Health (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct a typology of general practitioners' (GPs) responses regarding their justification of therapeutic inertia in cardiovascular primary prevention for high-risk patients with hypertension.

designEmpirically grounded construction of typology. Types were defined by attributes derived from the qualitative analysis of GPs' reported reasons for inaction.

participants256 GPs randomised in the intervention group of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

settingGPs members of 23 French Regional Colleges of Teachers in General Practice, included in the EffectS of a multifaceted intervention on CArdiovascular risk factors in high-risk hyPErtensive patients (ESCAPE) trial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The database consisted of 2638 written responses given by the GPs to an open-ended question asking for the reasons why drug treatment was not changed as suggested by the national guidelines. All answers were coded using constant comparison analysis. A matrix analysis of codes per GP allowed the construction of a response typology, where types were defined by codes as attributes. Initial coding and definition of types were performed independently by two teams.

resultsInitial coding resulted in a list of 69 codes in the final codebook, representing 4764 coded references in the question responses. A typology including seven types was constructed. 100 GPs were allocated to one and only one of these types, while 25 GPs did not provide enough data to allow classification. Types (numbers of GPs allocated) were: 'optimists' (28), 'negotiators' (20), 'checkers' (15), 'contextualisers' (13), 'cautious' (11), 'rounders' (8) and 'scientists' (5). For the 36 GPs that provided 50 or more coded references, analysis of the code evolution over time and across patients showed a consistent belonging to the initial type for any given GP.

conclusionThis typology could provide GPs with some insight into their general ways of considering changes in the treatment/management of cardiovascular risk factors and guide design of specific physician-centred interventions to reduce inappropriate inaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00348855.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical CompetenceFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionAntihypertensive AgentsPRIMARY CAREQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID27178974
PMCPMC4874143
OpenAlexW2351716488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.