Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178969›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Strengthening leadership as a catalyst for enhanced patient safety culture: a repeated cross-sectional experimental study.

Solvejg Kristensen, Karl Bang Christensen, Annette Jaquet, Carsten Møller Beck, Svend Sabroe, Paul Bartels, Jan Mainz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Solvejg KristensenThe Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark Aalborg University Hospital-Psychiatric Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Karl Bang ChristensenDepartment of Biostatics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette JaquetAalborg University Hospital-Psychiatric Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Carsten Møller BeckAalborg University Hospital-Psychiatric Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Svend SabroeDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Paul BartelsThe Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jan MainzAalborg University Hospital-Psychiatric Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent literature emphasises that clinical leaders are in a position to enable a culture of safety, and that the safety culture is a performance mediator with the potential to influence patient outcomes. This paper aims to investigate staff's perceptions of patient safety culture in a Danish psychiatric department before and after a leadership intervention.

methodsA repeated cross-sectional experimental study by design was applied. In 2 surveys, healthcare staff were asked about their perceptions of the patient safety culture using the 7 patient safety culture dimensions in the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. To broaden knowledge and strengthen leadership skills, a multicomponent programme consisting of academic input, exercises, reflections and discussions, networking, and action learning was implemented among the clinical area level leaders.

resultsIn total, 358 and 325 staff members participated before and after the intervention, respectively. 19 of the staff members were clinical area level leaders. In both surveys, the response rate was >75%. The proportion of frontline staff with positive attitudes improved by ≥5% for 5 of the 7 patient safety culture dimensions over time. 6 patient safety culture dimensions became more positive (increase in mean) (p<0.05). Frontline staff became more positive on all dimensions except stress recognition (p<0.05). For the leaders, the opposite was the case (p<0.05). Staff leaving the department after the first measurement had rated job satisfaction lower than the staff staying on (p<0.05).

conclusionsThe improvements documented in the patient safety culture are remarkable, and imply that strengthening the leadership can act as a significant catalyst for patient safety culture improvement. Further studies using a longitudinal study design are recommended to investigate the mechanism behind leadership's influence on patient safety culture, sustainability of improvements over time, and the association of change in the patient safety culture measures with change in psychiatric patient safety outcomes.

Indexed as

LeadershipMedical Staff, HospitalPatient SafetyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInservice TrainingMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational CultureSafety Managementinterventionleadershippatient safety culturePSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID27178969
PMCPMC4874125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.