Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178765›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016

Extended-release naltrexone opioid treatment at jail reentry (XOR).

Ryan D McDonald, Babak Tofighi, Eugene Laska, Keith Goldfeld, Wanda Bonilla, Mara Flannery, Nadina Santana-Correa, Christopher W Johnson, Neil Leibowitz, John Rotrosen and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sustained-release naltrexone for opioid dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ryan D McDonaldDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Babak TofighiDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Eugene LaskaDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University, United States.
Keith GoldfeldDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Wanda BonillaDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Mara FlanneryDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Nadina Santana-CorreaDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Christopher W JohnsonNew York City Health+Hospital Corporation, Correctional Health Services, United States.
Neil LeibowitzNew York City Health+Hospital Corporation, Correctional Health Services, United States.
John RotrosenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University, United States.
Marc N GourevitchDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States.
Joshua D LeeDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, New York University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: joshua.lee@med.nyu.edu.

Funding

Extended-Release Naltrexone Opioid Treatment at Jail-to-Community Re-entryU01DA033336 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEE, JOSHUA D · 2013 to 2018
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA033336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) is an injectable monthly sustained-release mu opioid receptor antagonist, which blocks the typical effects of heroin and other opioid agonists. Use of XR-NTX among opioid dependent persons leaving jails and prisons is increasing despite scant high-quality evidence regarding XR-NTX's effectiveness at re-entry.

methodsThis 24-week, open-label randomized controlled trial examines the effectiveness of XR-NTX as opioid relapse prevention at release from jail (N=85) compared to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU, N=85). A third, non-randomized, quasi-experimental naturalistic arm of participants who have newly initiated a jail-to-community methadone treatment program (MTP, N=85) allows for comparisons to a methadone standard-of-care.

resultsWe describe the rationale, design, and primary and secondary outcomes of the study. The primary outcome is an opioid relapse event; the primary contrast is a time-to-relapse comparison of XR-NTX and ETAU over a 24-week treatment phase. Secondary outcomes are rates of: (a) post-release opioid treatment participation, (b) opioid, alcohol, and cocaine use, (c) injection drug use and HIV sexual risk behaviors, (d) overdose (fatal and non-fatal) and all-cause mortality, and, (e) re-incarceration.

conclusionsXR-NTX is a potentially important, effective treatment and relapse prevention option for a large US population of persons with opioid use disorders leaving jails. This study will estimate XR-NTX's effectiveness relative to existing standards of care, including counseling-only treatment-as-usual and methadone maintenance.

Indexed as

PrisonsAnalgesics, OpioidCause of DeathDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug OverdoseHumansInjections, IntramuscularMethadoneMortalityNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient ParticipationSecondary PreventionAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsCriminal justiceExtended-release naltrexoneJailNaltrexoneOpioid relapse prevention

Identifiers

PMID27178765
PMCPMC5455014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.