Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178670›Full record

Observational studyAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2016

Short-term Prognosis and Current Management of Syncopal Patients at Intermediate Risk: Results from the IRiS (Intermediate-Risk Syncope) Study.

Filippo Numeroso, Gianluigi Mossini, Michela Giovanelli, Giuseppe Lippi, Gianfranco Cervellin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: Another Step Forward.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo NumerosoEmergency Department, Academic Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gianluigi MossiniEmergency Department, Academic Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Michela GiovanelliPostgraduate School of Emergency Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Academic Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gianfranco CervellinEmergency Department, Academic Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite guidelines, admission rates and expenditures for syncope remain high. This may be caused by an imprecise definition of cardiovascular disease considered at risk and an overestimation of the role of comorbidities and advanced age. In a cohort of patients with undetermined syncope, we prospectively compared the short-term prognosis of patients at intermediate risk (i.e., with stable heart diseases or comorbidities, of any age) versus those at high risk for cardiogenic syncope and identified factors associated with serious events. Secondarily, we analyzed the current management of intermediate-risk patients.

methodsIn a cohort of patients with undetermined syncope, we analyzed personal data, the presence of stable heart diseases or comorbidities, destination, length of hospitalization, incidence of serious events at 30 days, and costs.

resultsIn a 6-month period, 347 patients (185 male and 162 female, age 72.8 years) with undetermined syncope were enrolled, 250 at intermediate risk and 97 at high risk. Intermediate-risk patients were younger, with less frequent comorbidities and with a drastically lower incidence of serious events (0.8% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001). Risk factors for cardiogenic syncope were the unique variable associated with serious events. Intermediate-risk patients were mostly admitted (62.8%) in an ordinary ward or into an emergency department observation unit; in the case of ordinary admission we observed a mean prolonged hospitalization (8.8 days), elevated costs ($270,183), and a high rate of unexplained syncope (51%).

conclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the authors believe that intermediate-risk patients could be safely discharged, with potentially significant costs saving. In prognostic stratification, priority is to seek risk factors for cardiogenic syncope while advanced age, stable heart diseases, or comorbidities likely lead to inappropriate hospitalization.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsSyncope

Identifiers

PMID27178670
OpenAlexW2374389791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.