ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2016
The extended Toronto criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective validation study.
Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05185505 (Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Pre-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria), which is not on this map. Cited by 159 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Pre-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria: A Feasibility Study
Who cites it
159 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Network meta-analysis and validation study of expanded liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma: Significant role of alpha-fetoprotein.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Pooled it
- Taiwan liver cancer association management consensus guidelines for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Guideline
- Surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma and those beyond BCLC: systematic review with proposed management algorithm.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Bile Duct Tumor-Associated Thrombi: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.Frontiers in transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- Prospective evaluation of Gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma detection and transplant eligibility assessment with explant histopathology correlation.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Trial
- Liver transplant for large hepatocellular carcinoma in Malatya: The role of gamma glutamyl transferase and alpha-fetoprotein, a retrospective cohort study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Trial
- Post-Transplant HCC Recurrence and Survival: Impact of Bridging Therapy and Tumor Biology in 185 Consecutive Liver Transplants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Prior to Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Pre-operative risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant recipients by non-invasive detection of pre-existing genetic lesions.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Improving surgical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: from patient selection and downstaging to risk stratification and post-transplant surveillance.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Development of a Nomogram Model to Predict Post-Transplant Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond the Milan Criteria Undergoing TACE Bridging Therapy.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Pretransplant albumin-to-globulin ratio and long-term outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-center cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Transplant Oncology-A New Frontier in Liver Cancer Care.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Management of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation: latest developments.Hepatic oncology · 2025Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Transplant Criteria Show Poor Negative Predictive Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Review Article: Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Modern approach to hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Managing hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Discover oncology · 2025Review
99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies mostly on tumor size and number. Instead of relying on these factors, we used poor tumor differentiation and cancer-related symptoms to exclude patients likely to have advanced HCC with aggressive biology. We initially reported similar 5-year survival for patients whose tumors exceeded (M+ group) and were within (M group) the Milan criteria. Herein, we validate our original data with a new prospective cohort and report the long-term follow-up (10-years) using an intention-to-treat analysis. The previously published study (cohort 1) included 362 listed (294 transplanted) patients from January 1996 to August 2008. The validation cohort (cohort 2) includes 243 listed (105 M+ group, 76 beyond University of California San Francisco criteria; 210 transplanted) patients from September 2008 to December 2012. Median follow-up from listing was 59.7 (26.8-103) months. For the validation cohort 2, the actuarial survival from transplant for the M+ group was similar to that of the M group at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years: 94%, 76%, and 69% versus 95%, 82%, and 78% (P = 0.3). For the combined cohorts 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in the 10-year actuarial survival from transplant between groups. On an intention-to-treat basis, the dropout rate was higher in the M+ group and the 5-year and 10-year survival rates from listing were decreased in the M+ group. An alpha-fetoprotein level >500 ng/mL predicted poorer outcomes for both the M and M+ groups.
conclusionTumor differentiation and cancer-related symptoms of HCC can be used to select patients with advanced HCC who are appropriate candidates for liver transplantation; alpha-fetoprotein level limitations should be incorporated in the listing criteria for patients within or beyond the Milan criteria. (Hepatology 2016;64:2077-2088).
Indexed as
Identifiers
27178646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.