Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178477›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2016

Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care.

Benjamin D Bray, Geoffrey C Cloud, Martin A James, Harry Hemingway, Lizz Paley, Kevin Stewart, Pippa J Tyrrell, Charles D A Wolfe, Anthony G Rudd, SSNAP collaboration

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 83 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
26.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Risk of unexpected newborn complications by day of the week and time of birth in US term singleton births.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin D BrayFarr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: benjamin.bray@kcl.ac.uk.
Geoffrey C CloudSt George's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Martin A JamesRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Harry HemingwayFarr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK.
Lizz PaleyRoyal College of Physicians, London, UK.
Kevin StewartClinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, London, UK.
Pippa J TyrrellManchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Charles D A WolfeDivision of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Anthony G RuddDivision of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK.
SSNAP collaboration
King's College London · GBFarr Institute · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UKBritish Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health RP-PG-0407-10184Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies in many health systems have shown evidence of poorer quality health care for patients admitted on weekends or overnight than for those admitted during the week (the so-called weekend effect). We postulated that variation in quality was dependent on not only day, but also time, of admission, and aimed to describe the pattern and magnitude of variation in the quality of acute stroke care across the entire week.

methodsWe did this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. We included all adult patients (aged >16 years) admitted to hospital with acute stroke (ischaemic or primary intracerebral haemorrhage) in England and Wales between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Our outcome measure was 30 day post-admission survival. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for 13 indicators of acute stroke-care quality by fitting multilevel multivariable regression models across 42 4-h time periods per week.

findingsThe study cohort comprised 74,307 patients with acute stroke admitted to 199 hospitals. Care quality varied across the entire week, not only between weekends and weekdays, with different quality measures showing different patterns and magnitudes of temporal variation. We identified four patterns of variation: a diurnal pattern (thrombolysis, brain scan within 12 h, brain scan within 1 h, dysphagia screening), a day of the week pattern (stroke physician assessment, nurse assessment, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and assessment of communication and swallowing by a speech and language therapist), an off-hours pattern (door-to-needle time for thrombolysis), and a flow pattern whereby quality changed sequentially across days (stroke-unit admission within 4 h). The largest magnitude of variation was for door-to-needle time within 60 min (range in quality 35-66% [16/46-232/350]; coefficient of variation 18·2). There was no difference in 30 day survival between weekends and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·95-1·13), but patients admitted overnight on weekdays had lower odds of survival (0·90, 0·82-0·99).

interpretationThe weekend effect is a simplification, and just one of several patterns of weekly variation occurring in the quality of stroke care. Weekly variation should be further investigated in other health-care settings, and quality improvement should focus on reducing temporal variation in quality and not only the weekend effect.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCohort StudiesDeglutition DisordersEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMass ScreeningMedical AuditOccupational TherapyPhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID27178477
OpenAlexW2363586703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.