Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27178257›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2016

Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose-response analysis.

Daniela J Conrado, Sriram Krishnaswami, Satoshi Shoji, Sheela Kolluri, Judith Hey-Hadavi, Dorothy McCabe, Ricardo Rojo, Brinda K Tammara

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Glucose metabolism in Cushing's syndrome.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela J ConradoPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Groton, CT, USA.
Sriram KrishnaswamiPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Groton, CT, USA.
Satoshi ShojiPfizer Japan Inc. Development Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Sheela KolluriPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Pfizer, NY, USA.
Judith Hey-HadaviPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Pfizer, NY, USA.
Dorothy McCabePfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Pfizer, NY, USA.
Ricardo RojoPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Groton, CT, USA.
Brinda K TammaraPfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business, Collegeville, PA, USA. brinda.tammara@pfizer.com.
Pfizer (United States) · USPfizer (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PF-04171327 is a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR) being developed to retain anti-inflammatory efficacy while reducing unwanted effects. Our aim was to conduct a longitudinal dose-response analysis to identify the DAGR doses with efficacy similar to or greater than prednisone 10 mg once daily (QD). The data included were from a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in 323 subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis on a background of methotrexate. Subjects received DAGR 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg, prednisone 5 or 10 mg, or placebo QD for 8 weeks. The Disease Activity Score 28-4 calculated using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) was the efficacy endpoint utilized in this dose-response model. For DAGR, the maximum effect (Emax) on DAS28-4 CRP was estimated to be -1.2 points (95 % CI -1.7, -0.84), and the evaluated dose range provided 31-87 % of the Emax; for prednisone 5 and 10 mg, the estimated effects were -0.27 (95 % CI -0.55, 0.006) and -0.94 point (95 % CI -1.3, -0.59), respectively. Stochastic simulations indicated that the DAGR 1, 5, 10 and 15 mg have probabilities of 0.9, 29, 54 and 62 %, respectively, to achieve efficacy greater than prednisone 10 mg at week 8. DAGR 9 mg estimated probability was 50 % suggesting that DAGR ≥9 mg QD has an effect on DAS28-4 CRP comparable to or greater than prednisone 10 mg QD. This work informs dose selection for late-stage confirmatory trials.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBenzamidesComputer SimulationC-Reactive ProteinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBenzamidesC-Reactive ProteinfosdagrocoratOrganophosphatesPhenanthrenesReceptors, GlucocorticoidDisease activity score 28-4 C-reactive protein (DAS28-4 CRP)Dissociated agonist of glucocorticoid receptor (DAGR)Longitudinal dose–responsePhase 2 randomized double-blind clinical trialRheumatoid arthritis (RA)Stochastic simulations

Identifiers

PMID27178257
OpenAlexW2381801185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.