Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177953›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Surgical management of empyematous cholecystitis: a register study of over 12,000 cases from a regional quality control database in Germany.

Peter C Ambe, Stefan Jansen, Susanne Macher-Heidrich, Hubert Zirngibl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acute cholecystitis complicated with gallbladder empyema due toTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter C AmbeDepartment of Surgery II, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. Peter.ambe@helios-kliniken.de.
Stefan JansenDepartment of Surgery II, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Susanne Macher-HeidrichInstitute of Quality Control in Health Care, Medical Association Nordrhein Westphalia, Tersteegenstr. 9, 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hubert ZirngiblDepartment of Surgery II, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute cholecystitis is a common indication for surgery. Surgical outcomes depend among other factors on the extent of gallbladder inflammation. Data on the outcomes of patients undergoing cholecystectomy due to acute empyematous cholecystitis are rare.

methodsData from a prospectively maintained quality control database in Germany were analyzed. Cases with empyematous cholecystitis were compared to cases without gallbladder empyema with regard to baseline features, clinical parameters and surgical outcomes.

resultsA total of 12,069 patients with empyematous cholecystitis (EC) were compared to 33,296 patients without empyema. The male gender, advanced age, ASA score >2, elevated white blood count and fever were confirmed as risk factors for EC. The EC group differed significantly from the control group with regard to fever (28.0 vs. 9.5 %), elevated WBC (82.5 vs. 62.3 %) and positive findings from ultrasound sonography (87.4 vs. 76.9 %), p < 0001. Surgery lasted significantly longer in the EC group (86.1 ± 38.5 vs. 72.2 ± 33.6, p < 0.001). The rates of conversion (15.2 vs. 5.8 %), bile duct injury (0.8 vs. 0.4 %), re-intervention (5.5 vs. 2.6 %) and mortality (2.8 vs. 1.2 %) were significantly higher in the EC group, p < 0.001. Similarly, the length of stay (11.9 ± 10.5 vs. 8.8 ± 8.3, p < 0.001) was significantly longer in the EC group.

conclusionEmpyematous cholecystitis is a severe form of acute cholecystitis with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Even the experienced laparoscopic surgeon should expect dissection difficulties, therefore the threshold for conversion in order to prevent bile duct injury should be low.

Indexed as

AdultCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteDatabases, FactualFemaleGermanyHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality ControlRegistriesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisBile duct injuryConversion to open cholecystectomyEmpyematous cholecystitisGallbladder empyemaLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID27177953
OpenAlexW2373776895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.