Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177760›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2016

System events: readily accessible features for surgical phase detection.

Anand Malpani, Colin Lea, Chi Chiung Grace Chen, Gregory D Hager

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bidirectional long short-term memory for surgical skill classification of temporally segmented tasks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  10. CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020
    Article
  11. Novel evaluation of surgical activity recognition models using task-based efficiency metrics.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Temporal clustering of surgical activities in robot-assisted surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anand MalpaniDepartment of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Malone Hall Room 340, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. amalpan1@jhu.edu.
Colin LeaDepartment of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Malone Hall Room 340, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Chi Chiung Grace ChenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 301 Mason Lord Drive, Suite 3200, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Gregory D HagerDepartment of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Malone Hall Room 340, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical phase recognition using sensor data is challenging due to high variation in patient anatomy and surgeon-specific operating styles. Segmenting surgical procedures into constituent phases is of significant utility for resident training, education, self-review, and context-aware operating room technologies. Phase annotation is a highly labor-intensive task and would benefit greatly from automated solutions.

methodsWe propose a novel approach using system events-for example, activation of cautery tools-that are easily captured in most surgical procedures. Our method involves extracting event-based features over 90-s intervals and assigning a phase label to each interval. We explore three classification techniques: support vector machines, random forests, and temporal convolution neural networks. Each of these models independently predicts a label for each time interval. We also examine segmental inference using an approach based on the semi-Markov conditional random field, which jointly performs phase segmentation and classification. Our method is evaluated on a data set of 24 robot-assisted hysterectomy procedures.

resultsOur framework is able to detect surgical phases with an accuracy of 74 % using event-based features over a set of five different phases-ligation, dissection, colpotomy, cuff closure, and background. Precision and recall values for the cuff closure (Precision: 83 %, Recall: 98 %) and dissection (Precision: 75 %, Recall: 88 %) classes were higher than other classes. The normalized Levenshtein distance between predicted and ground truth phase sequence was 25 %.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that system events features are useful for automatically detecting surgical phase. Events contain phase information that cannot be obtained from motion data and that would require advanced computer vision algorithms to extract from a video. Many of these events are not specific to robotic surgery and can easily be recorded in non-robotic surgical modalities. In future work, we plan to combine information from system events, tool motion, and videos to automate phase detection in surgical procedures.

Indexed as

HysterectomyNeural Networks, ComputerRobotic Surgical ProceduresSupport Vector MachineTask Performance and AnalysisWorkflowAlgorithmsFemaleHumansModels, AnatomicModels, TheoreticalMotionSurgical Procedures, OperativeRobot-assisted surgerySensor dataSurgical phase detectionSurgical process modelingSurgical task flowSurgical workflow analysisSystem events

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.