ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2016
System events: readily accessible features for surgical phase detection.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of annotation for surgical process model analysis in minimally invasive surgery based on video.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- International expert consensus-driven surgical process model for robot-assisted hysterectomy: Delphi study results.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Automated assessment of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill performance using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transferable situation recognition system for scenario-independent context-aware surgical assistance systems: a proof of concept.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Process model analysis of parenchyma sparing laparoscopic liver surgery to recognize surgical steps and predict impact of new technologies.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Video Analysis Using Temporal, Attention, and Multi-Feature Fusion Based-Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- State-of-the-art of situation recognition systems for intraoperative procedures.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Review
- A Review on the Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Operating Room.Surgical innovation · 2021Review
- Bidirectional long short-term memory for surgical skill classification of temporally segmented tasks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020Article
- Novel evaluation of surgical activity recognition models using task-based efficiency metrics.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019Article
- Surgical data processing for smart intraoperative assistance systems.Innovative surgical sciences · 2017Review
- Temporal clustering of surgical activities in robot-assisted surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical phase recognition using sensor data is challenging due to high variation in patient anatomy and surgeon-specific operating styles. Segmenting surgical procedures into constituent phases is of significant utility for resident training, education, self-review, and context-aware operating room technologies. Phase annotation is a highly labor-intensive task and would benefit greatly from automated solutions.
methodsWe propose a novel approach using system events-for example, activation of cautery tools-that are easily captured in most surgical procedures. Our method involves extracting event-based features over 90-s intervals and assigning a phase label to each interval. We explore three classification techniques: support vector machines, random forests, and temporal convolution neural networks. Each of these models independently predicts a label for each time interval. We also examine segmental inference using an approach based on the semi-Markov conditional random field, which jointly performs phase segmentation and classification. Our method is evaluated on a data set of 24 robot-assisted hysterectomy procedures.
resultsOur framework is able to detect surgical phases with an accuracy of 74 % using event-based features over a set of five different phases-ligation, dissection, colpotomy, cuff closure, and background. Precision and recall values for the cuff closure (Precision: 83 %, Recall: 98 %) and dissection (Precision: 75 %, Recall: 88 %) classes were higher than other classes. The normalized Levenshtein distance between predicted and ground truth phase sequence was 25 %.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that system events features are useful for automatically detecting surgical phase. Events contain phase information that cannot be obtained from motion data and that would require advanced computer vision algorithms to extract from a video. Many of these events are not specific to robotic surgery and can easily be recorded in non-robotic surgical modalities. In future work, we plan to combine information from system events, tool motion, and videos to automate phase detection in surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27177760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.