Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177753›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Mammary candidiasis: molecular-based detection of Candida species in human milk samples.

W Mutschlechner, D Karall, C Hartmann, B Streiter, S Baumgartner-Sigl, D Orth-Höller, C Lass-Flörl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nipple candidiasis and painful lactation: an updated overview.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Mycobiome in the Gut: A Multiperspective Review.Mediators of inflammation · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W MutschlechnerDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. hygiene-bakteriologie@i-med.ac.at.
D KarallClinic for Pediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
C HartmannDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
B StreiterGeneral Medical Practitioner and Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC) in Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
S Baumgartner-SiglClinic for Pediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
D Orth-HöllerDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
C Lass-FlörlDivision of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this prospective and monocentric study, we investigated the performance of a commercialized real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test system for the specific detection of DNA from Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis in human milk samples of patients suspicious of mammary candidiasis. For this purpose, 43 breast-feeding women with characteristic symptoms of mammary candidiasis and 40 asymptomatic controls were enrolled. By culture, Candida spp. were detected in 8.8 % (4/46) and 9.3 % (4/43) of patient and control samples, respectively. Candida albicans (2/46), C. parapsilosis (1/46), and C. guilliermondii (1/46) were present in patient samples, and C. lusitaniae (3/43) and C. guilliermondii (1/43) were present in the controls. After RT-PCR was applied, Candida spp. were found to be present in 67.4 % (31/46) and 79.1 % (34/43) of patient and control samples investigated, respectively. PCR detection of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis revealed only a low sensitivity and specificity of 67.4 % and 41.9 %, respectively. Our data do not support the use of Candida RT-PCR for sensitive and specific diagnosis of mammary candidiasis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacteriaBreast DiseasesCandidaCandidiasisDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalFemaleHumansMilk, HumanMolecular TypingPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesYoung AdultDNA, BacterialDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID27177753
OpenAlexW2370283610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.