Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177591›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2016

Smartphone Applications to Support Tuberculosis Prevention and Treatment: Review and Evaluation.

Sarah J Iribarren, Rebecca Schnall, Patricia W Stone, Alex Carballo-Diéguez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05865626 (A Pilot Study to Evaluate Video Observed Treatment Among Tuberculosis Patients From Lambaréné Using an Instant Messenger Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05865626 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study to Evaluate Video Observed Treatment Among Tuberculosis Patients From Lambaréné Using an Instant Messenger Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre de Recherche Médicale de LambarénéRan2018 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsTuberculosisArmsVOT with and without cash incentive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. eHealth in TB clinical management.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Criteria for assessing the quality of mHealth apps: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnosis of COVID-19, vitality of emerging technologies and preventive measures.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J IribarrenColumbia University, School of Nursing, New York, NY, United States. si2277@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-0717
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · US

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MILTON L WAINBERG · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health problem and is the leading killer due to a single infectious disease. Mobile health (mHealth)-based tools such as smartphone apps have been suggested as tools to support TB control efforts (eg, identification, contact tracing, case management including patient support).

objectiveThe purpose of this review was to identify and assess the functionalities of mobile apps focused on prevention and treatment of TB.

methodsWe searched 3 online mobile app stores. Apps were included if they were focused on TB and were in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. For each included app, 11 functionalities were assessed (eg, inform, instruct, record), and searches were conducted to identify peer-review publications of rigorous testing of the available apps.

resultsA total of 1332 potentially relevant apps were identified, with 24 meeting our inclusion criteria. All of the apps were free to download, but 7 required login and password and were developed for specific clinics, regional sites, or research studies. Targeted users were mainly clinicians (n=17); few (n=4) apps were patient focused. Most apps (n=17) had 4 or fewer functions out of 11 (range 1-6). The most common functionalities were inform and record (n=15). Although a number of apps were identified with various functionalities to support TB efforts, some had issues such as incorrect spelling and grammar, inconsistent responses to data entry, problems with crashing, or links to features that had no data. Of more concern, some apps provided potentially harmful information to patients, such as links to natural remedies for TB and natural healers. One-third of the apps (8/24) had not been updated for more than a year and may no longer be supported. Peer-reviewed publications were identified for only two of the included apps. In the gray literature (not found in the app stores), three TB-related apps were identified as in progress, being launched, or tested.

conclusionsApps identified for TB prevention and treatment had minimal functionality, primarily targeted frontline health care workers, and focused on TB information (eg, general information, guidelines, and news) or data collection (eg, replace paper-based notification or tracking). Few apps were developed for use by patients and none were developed to support TB patient involvement and management in their care (eg, follow-up alerts/reminders, side effects monitoring) or improve interaction with their health care providers, limiting the potential of these apps to facilitate patient-centered care. Our evaluation shows that more refined work is needed to be done in the area of apps to support patients with active TB. Involving TB patients in treatment in the design of these apps is recommended.

Indexed as

mobile appsmobile healthreviewtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27177591
PMCPMC4884267
OpenAlexW2393830291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.