Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177586›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Malaria prevalence, severity and treatment outcome in relation to day 7 lumefantrine plasma concentration in pregnant women.

Ritah F Mutagonda, Appolinary A R Kamuhabwa, Omary M S Minzi, Siriel N Massawe, Betty A Maganda, Eleni Aklillu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Limited Polymorphism inInfection and drug resistance · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ritah F MutagondaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. BOX 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. rittdavisrida@yahoo.com.
Appolinary A R KamuhabwaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. BOX 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Omary M S MinziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. BOX 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Siriel N MassaweDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Allied Sciences, P.O. BOX 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Betty A MagandaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. BOX 65013, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eleni AklilluDepartment of Laboratory of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDay 7 plasma concentrations of lumefantrine (LF) can serve as a marker to predict malaria treatment outcome in different study populations. Two main cut-off points (175 and 280 ng/ml) are used to indicate plasma concentrations of LF, below which treatment failure is anticipated. However, there is limited data on the cumulative risk of recurrent parasitaemia (RP) in relation to day 7 LF plasma concentrations in pregnant women. This study describes the prevalence, severity, factors influencing treatment outcome of malaria in pregnancy and day 7 LF plasma concentration therapeutic cut-off points that predicts treatment outcome in pregnant women.

methodsThis was a one-arm prospective cohort study whereby 89 pregnant women with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria receiving artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) participated in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 for malaria parasite quantification. LF plasma concentrations were determined on day 7. The primary outcome measure was an adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) after treatment with ALu.

resultsThe prevalence of malaria in pregnant women was 8.1 % (95 % CI 6.85-9.35) of whom 3.4 % (95 % CI 1.49-8.51) had severe malaria. The overall PCR-uncorrected treatment failure rate was 11.7 % (95 % CI 0.54-13.46 %). Low baseline hemoglobin (<10 g/dl) and day 7 LF concentration <600 ng/ml were significant predictors of RP. The median day 7 LF concentration was significantly lower in pregnant women with RP (270 ng/ml) than those with ACPR (705 ng/ml) (p = 0.016). The relative risk of RP was 4.8 folds higher (p = 0.034) when cut-off of <280 ng/ml was compared to ≥280 ng/ml and 7.8-folds higher (p = 0.022) when cut-off of <600 ng/ml was compared to ≥600 ng/ml. The cut-off value of 175 ng/ml was not associated with the risk of RP (p = 0.399).

conclusionsPregnant women with day 7 LF concentration <600 ng/ml are at high risk of RP than those with ≥600 ng/ml. To achieve effective therapeutic outcome, higher day 7 venous plasma LF concentration ≥600 ng/ml is required for pregnant patients than the previously suggested cut-off value of 175 or 280 ng/ml for non-pregnant adult patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFemaleFluorenesHumansMalaria, FalciparumPlasmaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceProspective StudiesAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesLumefantrineMalariaPregnancyRecurrent parasitaemiaTanzania

Identifiers

PMID27177586
PMCPMC4866074
OpenAlexW2385039938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.