Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27177093›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2016

Beliefs About Dysmenorrhea and Their Relationship to Self-Management.

Chen X Chen, Kristine L Kwekkeboom, Sandra E Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Why Do Some Spanish Nursing Students with Menstrual Pain Fail to Consult Healthcare Professionals?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen X ChenPostdoctoral Fellow, Indiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU 414, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Kristine L KwekkeboomProfessor, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Sandra E WardProfessor Emerita, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is highly prevalent and is the leading cause of work and school absences among women of reproductive age. However, self-management of dysmenorrhea is not well understood in the US, and little evidence is available on factors that influence dysmenorrhea self-management. Guided by the Common Sense Model, we examined women's representations of dysmenorrhea (beliefs about causes, symptoms, consequences, timeline, controllability, coherence, and emotional responses), described their dysmenorrhea self-management behaviors, and investigated the relationship between representations and self-management behaviors. We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of 762 adult women who had dysmenorrhea symptoms in the last six months. Participants had varied beliefs about the causes of their dysmenorrhea symptoms, which were perceived as a normal part of life. Dysmenorrhea symptoms were reported as moderately severe, with consequences that moderately affected daily life. Women believed they understood their symptoms moderately well and perceived them as moderately controllable but them to continue through menopause. Most women did not seek professional care but rather used a variety of pharmacologic and complementary health approaches. Care-seeking and use of self-management strategies were associated with common sense beliefs about dysmenorrhea cause, consequences, timeline, and controllability. The findings may inform development and testing of self-management interventions that address dysmenorrhea representations and facilitate evidence-based management. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansSelf CareSurveys and Questionnairesbeliefscommon sense modeldysmenorrheaself-management

Identifiers

PMID27177093
PMCPMC7509811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.