SynthesisBMC psychiatry2016
Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with a severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-year efficacy of a lifestyle behavioural intervention on physical and mental health in people with severe mental disorders: results from a randomized controlled trial.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024Trial
- The Physical Health Care Fidelity Scale: Psychometric Properties.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Trial
- Risk of heart failure in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- A five-year risk prediction model of cardiovascular disease in individuals with bipolar disorder: a nationwide register study from Sweden.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of machine learning approaches for risk prediction of cardiovascular disease in individuals with schizophrenia: a nationwide Swedish and Danish study.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Association between depression and heart failure: A meta-analysis of cohort studies with 2.6 million participants.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation in a Latin American Population With Severe Mental Illness: An Observational Study.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Observational
- Is CONSORT a Risk of Bias Tool for Experimental Studies: A Big Misunderstanding.Journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- Transmural collaborative care model for the review of antipsychotics: a feasibility study of a complex intervention.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Study of Hypertension and Related Biophysical and Health-related Lifestyle Behaviors in Patients Suffering from Schizophrenia.Annals of neurosciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Cardiovascular risk assessment methods yield unequal risk predictions: a large cross-sectional study in psychiatric secondary care outpatients.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Management of dyslipidaemia in individuals with severe mental illness: a population-based study in the Greater Copenhagen Area.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- The Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients Suffering From Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Indirect acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK: a population-based study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2021Article
- Toward a broader view of mechanisms of drug cardiotoxicity.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Review
- Blood pressure in bipolar disorder: evidence of elevated pulse pressure and associations between mean pressure and mood instability.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2021Article
- NHS Health Checks for people with mental ill-health 2013-2017: an observational study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2020 · on this mapObservational
- Prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease in a psychiatric inpatient sample: results of the Metabolism in Psychiatry (MiP) Study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Observational
- Undiagnosed cardiovascular disease prior to cardiovascular death in individuals with severe mental illness.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular risk (CVR) has been observed to be higher in patients with severe mental illness (SMI) than in the general population. However, some studies suggest that CVR is not equally increased in different subgroups of SMI. The purposes of this review are to summarise CVR scores of SMI patients and to determine the differences in CVR between patients with different SMIs and between SMI patients and the control-population.
methodsMEDLINE (via PubMed) was searched for literature published through August 28, 2014, followed by a snowball search in the Web of Science. Observational and experimental studies that reported CVR assessments in SMI patients using validated tools were included. The risk of bias was reported using STROBE and CONSORT criteria. Pooled continuous data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodological quality.
resultsA total of 3,608 articles were identified, of which 67 full text papers were assessed for eligibility and 35 were finally included in our review, in which 12,179 psychiatric patients and 225,951 comparative patients had been assessed. The most frequent diagnoses were schizophrenia and related diagnoses (45.7%), depressive disorders (14.7%), SMI (11.4%) and bipolar disorders (8.6%). The most frequent CVR assessment tool used was the Framingham risk score. Subgroups analysis showed a higher CVR in schizophrenia than in depressive disorder or in studies that included patients with multiple psychiatric diagnoses (SMD: 0.63, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Total overall CVR did not differ between SMI patients and controls (SMD: 0.35 [95% CI:-0.02 to 0.71], p = 0.06); high heterogeneity was observed (I (2) = 93%; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe summary of results from studies that assessed CVR using validated tools in SMI patients did not find sufficient data (except for limited evidence associated with schizophrenia) to permit any clear conclusions about increased CVR in this group of patients compared to the general population. The systematic review is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42013003898 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.