Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27176006›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Healthy ageing in Europe: prioritizing interventions to improve health literacy.

Julii Brainard, Yoon Loke, Charlotte Salter, Tamás Koós, Péter Csizmadia, Alexandra Makai, Boróka Gács, Mária Szepes, Irohla Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Levels and Correlates of Numeracy Skills in Lebanese Adults with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Correlates of healthcare and financial decision making among older adults without dementia.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julii BrainardNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. j.brainard@uea.ac.uk.
Yoon LokeNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Charlotte SalterNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Tamás KoósHungarian National Institute for Health Development, Budapest, 1437, Hungary.
Péter CsizmadiaHungarian National Institute for Health Development, Budapest, 1437, Hungary.
Alexandra MakaiHungarian National Institute for Health Development, Budapest, 1437, Hungary.
Boróka GácsHungarian National Institute for Health Development, Budapest, 1437, Hungary.
Mária SzepesHungarian National Institute for Health Development, Budapest, 1437, Hungary.
Irohla Consortium

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1207-15244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy (HL) is low for 40-50 % of the population in developed nations, and is strongly linked to many undesirable health outcomes. Older adults are particularly at risk. The intervention research on health literacy in ageing populations project systematically created a large inventory of HL interventions targeting adults age 50+ , to support practical production of policy and practice guidelines for promoting health literacy in European populations.

methodsWe comprehensively surveyed international scientific literature, grey literature and other sources (published 2003+) for implemented HL interventions that involved older adults. Studies were screened for eligibility criteria and further selected for aspects important in European public health policy, including priority diseases, risk factors and vulnerable target groups. Interventions were prioritised using a multiple criteria tool to select final interventions that also featured strong evidence of efficacy and a broad range of strategies.

resultsFrom nearly 7000 written summaries, 1097 met inclusion criteria, of which 233 were chosen for scoring and ranking. Of these, seven had the highest multi-criteria scores. Eight more articles were selected based on rounded criteria including a high multi-criteria score as well as elements of innovation. Final selections were 18 articles describing 15 programmes, which feature strong evidence of efficacy among important diseases or risk factors and vulnerable groups, or that had success with elements of innovation were identified. Most programmes tried to increase skills in communication, self-management and understanding healthcare or lifestyle choices.

conclusionsThese programmes have multiple positive attributes which could be used as guidance for developing innovative intervention programmes to trial on European older adults. They provide evidence of efficacy in addressing high priority diseases and risk factors.

Indexed as

AgingHealth LiteracyHealth PrioritiesAdultAgedEuropeHumansMiddle AgedHealth literacyMulti-criteria decision aidOlder adultsPrioritisation exercise

Identifiers

PMID27176006
PMCPMC4866482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.