Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175778›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Learning from Heterogeneous Data Sources: An Application in Spatial Proteomics.

Lisa M Breckels, Sean B Holden, David Wojnar, Claire M Mulvey, Andy Christoforou, Arnoud Groen, Matthew W B Trotter, Oliver Kohlbacher, Kathryn S Lilley, Laurent Gatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Separating Golgi Proteins fromThe Plant cell · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The subcellular organisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa M BreckelsComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sean B HoldenComputer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David WojnarQuantitative Biology Center, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Claire M MulveyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andy ChristoforouCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Arnoud GroenCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Matthew W B TrotterCelgene Institute for Translational Research Europe (CITRE), Sevilla, Spain.
Oliver KohlbacherQuantitative Biology Center, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kathryn S LilleyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laurent GattoComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-cellular localisation of proteins is an essential post-translational regulatory mechanism that can be assayed using high-throughput mass spectrometry (MS). These MS-based spatial proteomics experiments enable us to pinpoint the sub-cellular distribution of thousands of proteins in a specific system under controlled conditions. Recent advances in high-throughput MS methods have yielded a plethora of experimental spatial proteomics data for the cell biology community. Yet, there are many third-party data sources, such as immunofluorescence microscopy or protein annotations and sequences, which represent a rich and vast source of complementary information. We present a unique transfer learning classification framework that utilises a nearest-neighbour or support vector machine system, to integrate heterogeneous data sources to considerably improve on the quantity and quality of sub-cellular protein assignment. We demonstrate the utility of our algorithms through evaluation of five experimental datasets, from four different species in conjunction with four different auxiliary data sources to classify proteins to tens of sub-cellular compartments with high generalisation accuracy. We further apply the method to an experiment on pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells to classify a set of previously unknown proteins, and validate our findings against a recent high resolution map of the mouse stem cell proteome. The methodology is distributed as part of the open-source Bioconductor pRoloc suite for spatial proteomics data analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArabidopsisComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDrosophilaEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMass SpectrometryMiceProteomeProteomicsSoftwareSubcellular FractionsSupport Vector MachineProteome

Identifiers

PMID27175778
PMCPMC4866734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.