Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175682›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer in Young Patients: A Large Institutional-Based Retrospective Study.

Tae Jun Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06271980 (Predicting Long-Term Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06271980 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Predicting Long-Term Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survivors

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled177ConditionsColorectal Cancer Recurrent, Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal AdenocarcinomaArmsENCORE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mutational and co-mutational landscape of early onset colorectal cancer.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tae Jun KimFrom the Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ran Kim
Sung Noh Hong
Dong Kyung Chang
Young-Ho Kim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of early-onset sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of sporadic CRC in young patients.From 2006 to 2011, 8207 patients underwent curative or palliative surgery for CRCs in our institution. A total of 693 patients who were ≤45 years old with sporadic CRC were enrolled as the young group. A total of 1823 patients aged between 56 and 65 years were identified as middle-aged control group for this study. Survival outcome and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.Young patients had higher recurrence rate than older patients in stages I and II (8.8% vs 2.7%, P <0.001). There was no significant difference of recurrence rate in stage III and IV cancers (27.5% vs 27.9%, P = 0.325). Metachronous cancers were developed more frequently in young patients (1.4% vs 0.6%, P = 0.038). Advanced stage CRC was diagnosed significantly more common in the young group (55.6% vs 47.9%, P = 0.001). High microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors are less likely to have advanced stage cancers (odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.70) or cancer recurrence (OR 0.11, 95% CI = 0.01-0.85) in young patients. Cancer-specific survival was worse in young patients than that in older patients (81.2% vs 87.8%, P <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival for each stage between the two groups. Independent prognostic factors for survival in young patients were undifferentiated cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 2.30, 95% CI = 1.23-4.31) and 3 months or longer duration of symptom (HR 2.57, 95% CI = 1.34-4.94). Young women had better survival compared with young men (HR 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33-0.90).Prognosis of sporadic CRC in young patients is poorer than older patients, because of poorer histologic differentiation and delay in diagnosis. Early detection of CRC confers survival benefit to young patients. Because of higher recurrence rate and metachronous cancer risk, post-operative surveillance is also important in young patients.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID27175682
PMCPMC4902524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.