Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175600›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Met and its ligand HGF are associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Cynthia Veenstra, Gizeh Pérez-Tenorio, Anna Stelling, Elin Karlsson, Sanam Mirwani Mirwani, Bo Nordensköljd, Tommy Fornander, Olle Stål

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oncology letters · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia VeenstraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Gizeh Pérez-TenorioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna StellingDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Elin KarlssonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sanam Mirwani MirwaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bo NordensköljdDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tommy FornanderDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olle StålDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Department of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few biomarkers exist to predict radiotherapy response in breast cancer. In vitro studies suggest a role for Met and its ligand HGF. To study this suggested role, MET and HGF gene copy numbers were determined by droplet digital PCR in tumours from 205 pre-menopausal and 184 post-menopausal patients, both cohorts randomised to receive either chemo- or radiotherapy. MET amplification was found in 8% of the patients in both cohorts and HGF amplification in 7% and 6% of the patients in the pre- and post-menopausal cohort, respectively. Met, phosphorylated Met (pMet), and HGF protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in the pre-menopausal cohort. Met, pMet, and HGF was expressed in 33%, 53%, and 49% of the tumours, respectively. MET amplification was associated with increased risk of distant recurrence for patients receiving chemotherapy. For the pre-menopausal patients, expression of cytoplasmic pMet and HGF significantly predicted benefit from radiotherapy in terms of loco-regional recurrence. Similar trends were seen for MET and HGF copy gain. In the post-menopausal cohort, no significant association of benefit from radiotherapy with neither genes nor proteins was found. The present results do not support that inhibition of Met prior to radiotherapy would be favourable for pre-menopausal breast cancer, as previously suggested.

Indexed as

Gene DosageAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGene AmplificationHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansImmunohistochemistryMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhosphorylationPostmenopauseAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHepatocyte Growth FactorHGF protein, humanMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metcopy number variationdroplet digital PCRradiationradiotherapytriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID27175600
PMCPMC5095065
OpenAlexW2412372305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.