ArticleLeukemia supplements2012
Minimal residual disease.
Article in Leukemia supplements, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic implication of early minimal residual disease evaluation in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Neuroblastoma GD2 Expression and Computational Analysis of Aptamer-Based Bioaffinity Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Stiffness based enrichment of leukemia cells using microfluidics.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
- [Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018Review
- Single-cell screening of multiple biophysical properties in leukemia diagnosis from peripheral blood by pure light scattering.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- How to assess minimal residual disease in pediatric and adult acute myeloid leukemia?Translational pediatrics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of minimal residual disease (MRD) studies in patients with acute leukemia is to measure initial treatment response accurately, provide an assessment of the residual leukemic burden throughout therapy and detect relapse early. Therefore, information resulting from MRD monitoring can substantially improve many facets of clinical management. Methods for MRD detection, namely flow cytometry and PCR, have been applied to study the remission status of thousands of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Collectively, the data indicate that MRD is a powerful prognostic indicator and an indispensable parameter for risk-adapted therapy. The current status of MRD in acute leukemia is briefly reviewed in this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.