Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175227›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2016

Filtering large-scale event collections using a combination of supervised and unsupervised learning for event trigger classification.

Farrokh Mehryary, Suwisa Kaewphan, Kai Hakala, Filip Ginter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. New reasons for biologists to write with a formal language.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farrokh MehryaryDepartment of Information Technology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland ; The University of Turku Graduate School (UTUGS), University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Suwisa KaewphanDepartment of Information Technology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland ; The University of Turku Graduate School (UTUGS), University of Turku, Turku, Finland ; Turku Centre for Computer Science (TUCS), Turku, Finland.
Kai HakalaDepartment of Information Technology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland ; The University of Turku Graduate School (UTUGS), University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Filip GinterDepartment of Information Technology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical event extraction is one of the key tasks in biomedical text mining, supporting various applications such as database curation and hypothesis generation. Several systems, some of which have been applied at a large scale, have been introduced to solve this task. Past studies have shown that the identification of the phrases describing biological processes, also known as trigger detection, is a crucial part of event extraction, and notable overall performance gains can be obtained by solely focusing on this sub-task. In this paper we propose a novel approach for filtering falsely identified triggers from large-scale event databases, thus improving the quality of knowledge extraction.

methodsOur method relies on state-of-the-art word embeddings, event statistics gathered from the whole biomedical literature, and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques. We focus on EVEX, an event database covering the whole PubMed and PubMed Central Open Access literature containing more than 40 million extracted events. The top most frequent EVEX trigger words are hierarchically clustered, and the resulting cluster tree is pruned to identify words that can never act as triggers regardless of their context. For rarely occurring trigger words we introduce a supervised approach trained on the combination of trigger word classification produced by the unsupervised clustering method and manual annotation.

resultsThe method is evaluated on the official test set of BioNLP Shared Task on Event Extraction. The evaluation shows that the method can be used to improve the performance of the state-of-the-art event extraction systems. This successful effort also translates into removing 1,338,075 of potentially incorrect events from EVEX, thus greatly improving the quality of the data. The method is not solely bound to the EVEX resource and can be thus used to improve the quality of any event extraction system or database. AVAILABILITY: The data and source code for this work are available at: http://bionlp-www.utu.fi/trigger-clustering/.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSupervised Machine LearningUnsupervised Machine LearningDatabases, FactualData MiningMedical InformaticsBioNLPEvent extractionTrigger detectionWord embeddings

Identifiers

PMID27175227
PMCPMC4864999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.