Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27175226›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2016

Extracting a stroke phenotype risk factor from Veteran Health Administration clinical reports: an information content analysis.

Danielle L Mowery, Brian E Chapman, Mike Conway, Brett R South, Erin Madden, Salomeh Keyhani, Wendy W Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Determining Onset for Familial Breast and Colorectal Cancer from Family History Comments in the Electronic Health Record.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle L MoweryDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; IDEAS Center, Veteran Affair Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Brian E ChapmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; IDEAS Center, Veteran Affair Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Mike ConwayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Brett R SouthDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; IDEAS Center, Veteran Affair Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Erin MaddenSan Francisco Veteran Affair Health Care System, San Francisco, CA USA.
Salomeh KeyhaniSan Francisco Veteran Affair Health Care System, San Francisco, CA USA.
Wendy W ChapmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; IDEAS Center, Veteran Affair Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT USA.

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Revascularization vs Medical TherapyR01HL114563 · NHLBI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI KEYHANI, SALOMEH · 2013 to 2018
$3.6M
Annotation, development and evaluation for clinical information extraction (transfer)R01GM090187 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W., ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2010 to 2013
$2.6M
Interactive Search and Review of Clinical Records with Multi-Layered Semantic AnnotationsR01LM010964 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W., HWA, REBECCA · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114563NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090187NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, 795,000 people suffer strokes each year; 10-15 % of these strokes can be attributed to stenosis caused by plaque in the carotid artery, a major stroke phenotype risk factor. Studies comparing treatments for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis are challenging for at least two reasons: 1) administrative billing codes (i.e., Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes) that identify carotid images do not denote which neurovascular arteries are affected and 2) the majority of the image reports are negative for carotid stenosis. Studies that rely on manual chart abstraction can be labor-intensive, expensive, and time-consuming. Natural Language Processing (NLP) can expedite the process of manual chart abstraction by automatically filtering reports with no/insignificant carotid stenosis findings and flagging reports with significant carotid stenosis findings; thus, potentially reducing effort, costs, and time.

methodsIn this pilot study, we conducted an information content analysis of carotid stenosis mentions in terms of their report location (Sections), report formats (structures) and linguistic descriptions (expressions) from Veteran Health Administration free-text reports. We assessed an NLP algorithm, pyConText's, ability to discern reports with significant carotid stenosis findings from reports with no/insignificant carotid stenosis findings given these three document composition factors for two report types: radiology (RAD) and text integration utility (TIU) notes.

resultsWe observed that most carotid mentions are recorded in prose using categorical expressions, within the Findings and Impression sections for RAD reports and within neither of these designated sections for TIU notes. For RAD reports, pyConText performed with high sensitivity (88 %), specificity (84 %), and negative predictive value (95 %) and reasonable positive predictive value (70 %). For TIU notes, pyConText performed with high specificity (87 %) and negative predictive value (92 %), reasonable sensitivity (73 %), and moderate positive predictive value (58 %). pyConText performed with the highest sensitivity processing the full report rather than the Findings or Impressions independently.

conclusionWe conclude that pyConText can reduce chart review efforts by filtering reports with no/insignificant carotid stenosis findings and flagging reports with significant carotid stenosis findings from the Veteran Health Administration electronic health record, and hence has utility for expediting a comparative effectiveness study of treatment strategies for stroke prevention.

Indexed as

Data MiningGovernment AgenciesNatural Language ProcessingPhenotypeStrokeVeteransAlgorithmsCarotid StenosisElectronic Health RecordsHumansRisk FactorsInformation extractionNatural language processingPhenotypeStroke

Identifiers

PMID27175226
PMCPMC4863379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.